Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2019

Constitutional Court Annuls Provision On Imprisonment For Opposition To Interim Injunctions

Gün + Partners
Gün + Partners
Contributor
Gün + Partners

Gün + Partners

We are one of the oldest and largest law firms in Turkey and are considered internationally to be...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gün + Partners

Article 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure previously set out that parties which failed to comply with an interim injunction or that violated an injunction would face one to six months' imprisonment.

TurkeyGovernment, Public Sector

Article 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure previously set out that parties which failed to comply with an interim injunction or that violated an injunction would face one to six months' imprisonment.

However, following an application to the Istanbul First Intellectual and Industrial Property Court for the annulment of Article 398, the Constitutional Court decided to cancel the first sentence of Article 398(1) regarding imprisonment for opposition to interim injunctions.(1)

The Constitutional Court's decisions stated that the penalties set out in Article 398 regarding imprisonment were not contrary to the principle of proportionality set out in the Constitution. However, the court concluded that legal certainty and the right to legal remedies were harmed due to Article 398′s lack of clear regulation and the merits of the proceedings and legal remedies in this regard.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from