Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Maritime Claims In South Africa

What constitutes a "maritime claim" for purposes of admiralty jurisdiction? The most recent decision on the interpretation of the phrase "relating to" by the High Court of South Africa

South AfricaTransport

What constitutes a "maritime claim" for purposes of admiralty jurisdiction? The most recent decision on the interpretation of the phrase "relating to" by the High Court of South Africa

A maritime claim is defined in the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 (hereafter "the Act") as "any claim for, arising out of or relating to" (emphasis added) those grounds of jurisdiction listed in section 1(1) of the Act.  The characterisation of a claim as a "maritime claim" is crucial to the determination of whether a South African court of law has admiralty jurisdiction or not: only a court exercising its admiralty jurisdiction will have the competency to determine a maritime claim.  With this in mind, and therefore also unsurprisingly, the phrase "relating to" (as it appears in the definition of "maritime claim") has been the subject of a number of South African court cases, the most recent being Kuehne & Nagel (Pty) Ltd v Moncada Energy Group SRL (GSJ)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from