Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JUNE 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Standard Bank vs. SARB: Important Ruling On Cryptocurrencies And South African Exchange Controls

The recent judgment in Standard Bank v South African Reserve Bank addresses a long-standing debate in South African law: namely, whether cryptocurrencies constitute "capital" for purposes of Regulation 10(1)(c)...

South AfricaTechnology

The recent judgment in Standard Bank v South African Reserve Bank addresses a long-standing debate in South African law: namely, whether cryptocurrencies constitute "capital" for purposes of Regulation 10(1)(c) of the Exchange Control Regulations, issued in terms of section 9 of the Currency and Exchanges Act No. 9 of 1933 ("the Regulations").

The question was brought before the court by the Standard Bank of South Africa Limited ("Standard Bank"), challenging the South African Reserve Bank's ("SARB's") forfeiture of funds linked to cryptocurrency transactions initiated by Leo Cash and Carry (Pty) Ltd ("LCC"). Standard Bank, a secured creditor of LLC, argued, amongst other things, that the forfeiture was not justified as cryptocurrency should not be regarded as a form of capital for the purposes of the exchange control regime.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from