Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2012

Wal-Mart/Massmart Development Fund Increased

Webber Wentzel
Webber Wentzel
Contributor
Webber Wentzel

Webber Wentzel

Founded in 1868, Webber Wentzel is a leading full-service law firm that provides clients with...

View firm profile
Explore more from Webber Wentzel

On 9 October 2012 the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) handed down its judgment in SACCAWU's appeal against the Competition Tribunal's conditional approval of the acquisition by Wal-Mart of a controlling interest in Massmart.

South AfricaAntitrust/Competition Law
Desmond Rudman
Desmond Rudman
Robert Wilson
Robert Wilson

On 9 October 2012 the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) handed down its judgment in SACCAWU's appeal against the Competition Tribunal's conditional approval of the acquisition by Wal-Mart of a controlling interest in Massmart.

The decision follows the CAC's earlier judgment of 9 March 2012, in which the court ordered that a study should be commissioned to investigate the impact of the merger on SMMEs. The study also concerned the way in which the supplier development fund, which had been volunteered by the merger parties, should be funded and administered.

The CAC considered the reports submitted by Professor Mike Morris, who was appointed by the merger parties, and Professor Joseph Stiglitz and Mr James Hodge, who were appointed by the Government and SACCAWU. It consequently decided to increase the amount to be contributed by the merger parties to the fund from the initial ZAR 100 million ordered by the Tribunal, to ZAR 200 million.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from