Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 NOVEMBER 2012

Only One Small Slip-Up Is Enough

Many directors and managers of companies still associate prohibited anti-competitive conduct with dishonest intentions and smoke-filled rooms.

South AfricaAntitrust/Competition Law

Many directors and managers of companies still associate prohibited anti-competitive conduct with dishonest intentions and smoke-filled rooms. In reality, however, anti-competitive conduct which contravenes the Competition Act, 89 of 1998 ("the Competition Act") and results in the imposition of significant penalties, is often the result of an isolated incident in the greater market within which a business operates.

This fact was highlighted on the 10th of October 2012 when the Competition Tribunal confirmed a settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Pentel South Africa (Pty) Ltd ("Pentel").

In terms of the agreement, Pentel agreed to pay an administrative penalty to the sum of R2 840 451 (being 3.41% of Pentel's total turnover in the 2011 financial year) for its contravention of section 5(2) of the Competition Act. For ease of reference we refer to the matter as the "Pentel Case".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from