Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 OCTOBER 2014

In Competition Proceedings, Hasty Exception Applications May Be Futile

The Competition Tribunal published the reasons for its decision to grant an exception application in respect of the self-referral of a complaint by Protea Automation Solutions.

South AfricaAntitrust/Competition Law

On 3 September 2014, the Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") published the reasons for its decision to grant an exception application by Invensys plc, Invensys Systems (UK) Ltd and Eurotherm Ltd (collectively, "Invensys" or the "Invensys Group") in respect of the self-referral of a complaint by Protea Automation Solutions ("Protea"). The reasons restate a position that is very well known by competition practitioners: the Tribunal will, where possible, adopt a flexible approach to its processes, giving primacy to its inquisitorial powers and favouring considerations of fairness and flexibility over formalism.

The complaint has a long history; however, for present purposes, only the salient facts bear brief mention. The Invensys Group manages the international production, sales and distribution of various industrial automation and control system components, including through the "Eurotherm" and "Foxboro" brands. Until recently, the respondent, Protea, was –

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from