Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Proposed System Of Costs Scheduling For Insolvency Practitioners

This case concerns the quantum of professional fees reflected in a bill of costs issued by the receivers and managers ("R&Ms") of Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("Airtrust").

SingaporeInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Kao Chai-Chau Linda v Fong Wai Lyn Carolyn and others [2015] SGHC 260

INTRODUCTION

This case concerns the quantum of professional fees reflected in a bill of costs issued by the receivers and managers ("R&Ms") of Airtrust (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("Airtrust").

Having previously succeeded in objecting to three bills of costs presented to the High Court for approval by the R&Ms, and convincing the High Court to reduce the amounts charged by the R&Ms by between 38% and 42% in each instance, Jimmy Yim, SC, Erroll Ian Joseph, Daniel Soo, Mahesh Rai and Andrew Lee from Drew & Napier LLC (together with solicitors for other parties) launched another attack against this latest bill of costs presented to the High Court for approval.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from