Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2020

Forged Warehouse Receipts in Commodity Finance – Risks And Mitigants

The Court found that Marex had breached several terms of the purchase contracts, and rejected their construction of the terms of the purchase contracts.

SingaporeFinance and Banking

Natixis S.A. v Marex Financial and Access World Logistics (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2019] EWHC 2549 (Comm)

The English Commercial Court recently delivered a judgment which will have consequences in the area of commodity finance and in particular, the relationship between warehouse operators, commodity owners and financing banks, the legal status of warehouse receipts and the purpose of the acknowledgement of the warehouse operator that it holds the goods on behalf of the commodity owners.

Facts of Natixis v Marex

Natixis S.A. ("Natixis") is a bank that entered into five spot purchase contracts with Marex Financial ("Marex"), in which Marex agreed to sell, and Natixis agreed to buy, nickel stored at warehouses operating under the Access World group of companies. Under these purchase contracts, Marex had the option to repurchase the nickel at a later date and the documentation required that Marex deliver to Natixis warehouse receipts. Marex delivered hardcopy

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from