Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2016

Security For Costs In Investment Arbitration: Who Should Bear The Risk Of An Impecunious Claimant?

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)
Contributor
Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

Schoenherr is a leading European full-service law firm with a strong footprint across Central and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Schoenherr (Schönherr Rechtsanwälte)

The award, naturally, has value for the parties as long as it is not just a dead letter, but an effective enforceable decision.

SerbiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When allocating costs, investment arbitration tribunals apply two principles: a "pay your own way" principle which provides that each party pays its own legal costs and they effectively share the costs of the proceedings, and secondly a "costs follow the event" or "loser pays" principle which provides that the losing party bears the costs of the proceedings including the legal costs of the successful party. The latter is more frequently applied in its "adjusted" form, i.e. the costs are allocated in proportion to the relative success of the parties on different issues.

The "pay your own way" principle, applied by the majority of tribunals, was perceived as the traditional approach in investment arbitration. However, this no longer seems to be the case as the "(adjusted) costs follow the event" principle becomes more frequently endorsed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from