Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP’ returned 3 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Supreme Court Weighs In On Employer's Right To Review Employee's Text Messages

    Are employee’s text messages made during work considered private communications?
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
  • Article

    10 Tips On How To Use Anti-SLAPP Protection In Litigation

    In my practice, I have found that California's Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation Statute, Section 425.16 of the Code of Civil Procedure (known as the "anti-SLAPP statute"), can be an effective tool for defendants faced with lawsuits of dubious merit, because it allows the court, on motion, to scrutinize the merits of a case at a very early stage, and eliminate unmeritorious actions.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
  • Article

    When Is An Option Not An Option?

    Despite years of common law case law analyzing the issue of whether an enforceable option has been entered into, even today courts struggle with the issue.
    United StatesReal Estate and Construction
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
    Patton Martin & Sullivan, LLP
  • Showing 1–3 of 3 results

    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics