Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Novak Druce Carroll’ returned 6 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    EX PARTE REEXAMINATION RULE CHANGE: Why The New "Pre-Order" Procedure May Be A Trap

    Effective April 5, 2026, the USPTO introduced a "pre-order" procedure for ex parte reexaminations, allowing patent owners to respond within 30 days of service of a request, and before the Office decides whether a Substantial New Question of patentability (SNQ) exists.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Novak Druce Carroll
    Novak Druce Carroll
  • Article

    AI-Assisted Inventions: Human Inventorship And USPTO Disclosure Duties

    Quick Answer: AI-assisted inventions use the same U.S. inventorship standard as other inventions, with only human beings eligible as inventors. Technology companies should document each person's conception of the claimed invention before drafting claims and approving inventor declarations. The USPTO imposes no general AI-use disclosure duty, but information material to patentability can still require disclosure. [2] Patent counsel should assess inventorship, disclosure, and eligibility separately before the company commits to a filing strategy.
    United StatesTechnology
Novak Druce Carroll
Novak Druce Carroll
  • Article

    Beyond Defensive IP: Inside The Patent Deal Quietly Shaping AI Models (Part One Of Three)

    The Shared AI License Foundation, or SAIL, is an early signal that AI patent strategy is moving past the old binary choice between hoarding patents and suing over them.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Novak Druce Carroll
    Novak Druce Carroll
  • Article

    IPR Estoppel And PTAB Institution: What To Assess Before Filing

    IPR estoppel can restrict later patent-invalidity arguments after a final written decision on the reviewed claims. In-house defense counsel should assess those restrictions alongside the USPTO's separate decision about whether to institute review. Ironburg and Ingenico clarify estoppel's limits, while Magnolia explains why an additional administrative challenge may be denied.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Novak Druce Carroll
    Novak Druce Carroll
  • Article

    SAIL Membership Agreement Explained: What You Get, What You Give Up, And Why The Exit Is One-Way (Part Two Of Three)

    You get a license. You don't get a defense. And you don't get your grants back.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Novak Druce Carroll
    Novak Druce Carroll
  • Article

    USPTO Patent Eligibility Guidance: What To Review In Pending Technology Applications

    QUICK ANSWER: Technology companies should review pending patent applications against current USPTO eligibility guidance before choosing their next prosecution move.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Novak Druce Carroll
    Novak Druce Carroll
  • Showing 1–6 of 6 results

    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics