Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Dynocom Industries, Inc. v. Magicmotorsport SRL (D. Mass. 23-cv-12648).

    A federal judge has ruled on a discovery dispute involving patent infringement allegations, requiring an Italian company to make its accused product available for physical inspection.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Radius Health, Inc., f/k/a Nuvios, Inc. v. Orbicular Pharmaceutical Technologies Private Limited et al. (D. Mass. 24-cv-11770).

    Radius Health sued Orbicular Pharmaceutical and three related entities, asserting that an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") for a generic version of Tymlos® infringed its U.S. 11,977,067 patent.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    InMode Ltd. V. BTL Industries, Inc. (D. Mass. 24-cv-12955).

    InMode accused BTL of infringing a patent related to vaginal remodeling technology and methods. Following a stay pending a decision on the institution of an inter partes review...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Nextcea Inc. v. Lipotype, Inc. Et Al. (D. Mass. 24-cv-12624).

    Nextcea accused Lipotype of inducing and contributing to infringement of method claims concerning testing for isomers indicative of phospholipidosis and other lysosomal storage disorders.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Ruocco v. Deveau Et Al. (D. Mass. 25-cv-13475).

    Plaintiff Amy Ruocco, acting pro se, accused Sandra Deveau, Sara Hazel, and Xavier Group KW Coastal & Lakes and Mountains of infringing Ruocco’s copyright in photographs...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Swissdigital USA Co., Ltd. v. Samsonite International SA Et Al. (D. Mass. 24-cv-11636).

    Swissdigital had accused Samsonite of directly and indirectly infringing four patents – one covering luggage with a USB charging connector and three covering sheaths that can be incorporated into wearables or bags/luggage that provide for charging of personal devices.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    United States Patent And Trademark Office Announces Pre-Examination Patent Application Search Pilot

    On October 8, 2025, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced the launch of its Artificial Intelligence Search Automated Pilot (ASAP!) Program.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Hybir, Inc. v. Veeam Software Corporation (Fed. Cir. 2501367; D. Mass 20-cv-10329).

    Hybir accused Veeam of infringing patents relating to on-line backup systems that minimize duplication of the backed-up data at the source of the data. Judge Talwani found the asserted claims invalid...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc. et al. (D. Mass 17-cv-12311).

    A jury found that Abiomed's Impella intravascular pumps did not infringe Maquet's patent under the reverse doctrine of equivalents, despite meeting literal claim limitations, and determined the asserted patent claim was invalid for failing written description and enablement requirements. The case now awaits a judicial determination on whether assignor estoppel should preclude Abiomed from challenging the patent's validity.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Cogmedia LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. d/b/a Facebook, Inc. (D. Mass. 25-cv-12127).

    In July 2025, Cogmedia accused Meta of patent infringement, and while not disputing that venue was proper in Massachusetts, Meta moved to transfer the case to the Northern District of California.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Maquet Cardiovascular LLC v. Abiomed Inc. Et Al. (D. Mass 17-cv-12311).

    Maquet accused Abiomed of patent infringement involving intravascular blood pumps with steerable cannulas. The case centers on whether a patent claiming a blood pump genus is invalid for failing to describe internal motor species when only external motors were disclosed in the specification. Judge Saylor's ruling on summary judgment motions reveals critical questions about written description requirements and what constitutes claimed versus unclaimed elements in patent disputes.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    USPTO Offers Path To Faster Patent Examination Through New Pilot Program

    On October 24, 2025 the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced the launch of a new pilot program that will afford patent Applicants...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    FTC Drops Nationwide Non-Compete Ban: What Employers Need To Know

    On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") ended its quest to enact a nationwide ban of non-compete agreements. Specifically, the FTC voted to dismiss its appeal...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    New USPTO Guidance Expands Design Patent Eligibility For Digital Environments

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued new examination guidance that significantly relaxes the requirements for obtaining design patents covering digital interfaces, icons, and other computer-generated designs.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Rockefeller Photos, LLC v. Boston Pizza, Inc. D/b/a Boston Pizza Grill (25-cv-12299).

    Rockefeller Photos sells photographs to food and beverage businesses throughout the country. It had licenses, which included exclusivity in certain areas, to photographs from Prepared Food Photos...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    MSTM, LLC Et Al. v. AB Sciex LLC D/b/a SCIEX (D. Mass. 23-cv-11121)

    MSTM and co-plaintiff M&M Mass Spec Consulting, LLC alleged that Sciex entered into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements in connection with considering taking a license on the plaintiffs' mass spectrometry...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    USPTO Reaffirms Patent Eligibility For AI Innovations

    In Ex parte Desjardins (Google's DeepMind Technologies), the USPTO's Appeals Review Panel (ARP) vacated a §101 rejection of claims directed to a machine-learning training method...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Touhey v. Iron Builders Inc. (D. Mass. 24-cv-12577)

    A professional photographer sued Iron Builders for copyright infringement after discovering his photograph on their business website. When Iron Builders failed to timely respond to a summary judgment motion, the court examined whether technical issues with electronic filing notices and alleged surprise constituted good cause for the delay.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Supreme Court Addresses Induced Infringement Claims In Hikma v. Amarin

    Hikma manufactured generic icosapent ethyl, a drug pioneered by Amarin under the name Vascepa and approved by the FDA for the limited purpose of treating very high blood triglyceride levels, or severe...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Oppenheimer v. DCB And Associates, LLC Et Al. (D. Mass. 25-cv-10363).

    Photographer David Gordon Oppenheimer accused DCB and Associates ("DCB") (a Century 21 business) and DCB's manager and another employee of infringing his copyright in an aerial picture of Boston...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi

Showing 1–20 of 32 results

Next
Legal Intelligence Newsletters