Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Barger & Wolen LLP’ returned 4 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Attorney´s Fees Award Against Counsel Is Reversed For Lack Of Statutory Authorization

    In Hyde v. Del Nero, 2009 DJDAR 8329 (2009), the Ninth Circuit clarified whether a lawyer for a party may be liable for fees under 15 U.S.C. Section 1692k(a)(3) of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Barger & Wolen LLP
    Barger & Wolen LLP
  • Article

    Court Limits Vicarious Liability For Actions Of Putative Agent

    In a case litigated by Robert J. McKennon, the California Court of Appeals recognized significant limits on the vicarious liability of a principal based upon the acts or omissions of a putative agent.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Barger & Wolen LLP
    Barger & Wolen LLP
  • Article

    Fees Incurred for Monitoring Settlement Agreement Compliance are Recoverable Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

    In Prison Legal News v. Schwarzenegger, 2010 DJDAR 8612 (9th Circuit 2010) the court decided whether, and to what extent the publisher of, a monthly prison news magazine may recover attorneys’ fees from the State of California for monitoring the State’s compliance with a prior settlement agreement.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Barger & Wolen LLP
    Barger & Wolen LLP
  • Article

    Improper Involuntary Bankruptcy Petition Gives Rise to Award of Counsel Fees

    In Orange Blossom Limited Partnership v. Southern California Sunbelt Developers Inc. 2010 DJDAR 8623, Ninth Circuit (2010), the Ninth Circuit concluded that a bankruptcy court properly awarded costs, attorney’s fees and punitive damages against thirteen creditors that initiated an improper involuntary bankruptcy petition under 11 U.S.C. § 303 (i).
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Barger & Wolen LLP
    Barger & Wolen LLP
  • Showing 1–4 of 4 results

    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics