Your search for ‘Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP’ returned 3,402 results

On September 19, 2016, the Saskatchewan Minister of the Environment refused [PDF] environmental approval for the Chaplin Energy Project (Project).

On April 20, 2023, the Government of Canada introduced Bill C-47, the Budget Implementation Act, 2023, No. 1, an act to implement key commitments put forward in Budget 2023.

The Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act (PPCLA) came into force in Alberta on August 29, 2022. In an effort to facilitate prompt payment of all parties involved in a construction project, all the way down...

Canadian courts have considered claims for damages by generic drug companies kept off the market due to patents asserted by brand-name drug companies under Canada's pharmaceutical patent regulatory scheme...

In her January 7, 2015 decision in 1250264 Ontario Inc. v. Pet Valu Canada Inc., Justice Pardu of the Ontario Court of Appeal refused to grant leave to file a late notice of appeal notwithstanding the facts that:

The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal’s recent decision in BCE Inc. v. Gillis permanently and unconditionally stayed a class proceeding that had laid dormant for over a decade as the plaintiffs pursued a class proceeding in Saskatchewan.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario released its decision yesterday in Palmer v. Teva Canada Limited, affirming the denial of certification and dismissal of a proposed class action...

In the recent Ontario Divisional Court decision in Daneluzzi v. Daneluzzi, McKelvey J. considered a motion for leave to appeal from a summary judgment decision.

Justice Perell of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice denied payments sought by the representative Plaintiffs and substantially reduced counsel fees payable pursuant to the settlement.

A securities class action against Sino-Forest Corporation, its senior officers and directors, and others was commenced in July 2011 after Sino-Forest filed for CCAA protection.

In 1982, respondents "lost" their right of appeal as of right of a judgment authorizing a class action, which had been the rule from 1979 in class action proceedings (1010 of the CCP).

Just how "representative" should a representative plaintiff be? That question was at the heart of a pre-certification discovery motion in Daniells v McLellan, a privacy class action.

In R v. Perkins, the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that it did not have the jurisdiction to re-open a sentence appeal that had been heard on the merits.

Should a court hear from a defendant before approving third party funding of a class action against that defendant?

The recent cancellation of a significant public sector IT initiative in Ontario highlighted how frequently IT projects result in delay, cost overruns and generally unsatisfactory results.

Last week, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada reported on research undertaken by her office during the summer to assess whether websites in Canada are inappropriately "leaking" the personal information of registered users.

US compensation deductions for certain payments are threatened by a recent IRS position that reverses a long-standing interpretation that certain bonuses arrangements qualify for an exception to Code Section 162(m)’s deduction limitation for “performance-based” compensation.

Welcome to our seventh annual comprehensive report on diversity disclosure practices in Canada, covering disclosure by TSX-listed companies and CBCA corporations subject to disclosure requirements.