Your search for ‘Arthur Andersen’ returned 1,106 results

A California appellate court expressly rejected a "narrow restraint" exception to California’s non-compete statute, an exception relied on by federal courts to enforce non-competes against California employees where the restraint excludes an employee from a narrow portion of his or her profession.

In Samuelian v. Life Generations Healthcare, LLC, — Cal. App. 5th —, 2024 WL 3878448 (Cal. App. Aug. 20, 2024), the California Court of Appeal answered two long outstanding questions of California law...

The U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board, or ARB, recently held that whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("SOX") extends to employees of contractors providing SOX-compliance services to publicly traded companies.

One of the toughest tasks facing California businesses is preventing their employees from leaving the company and going to work for competitors or starting their own competing businesses.

In April of 2010, the Texas Supreme Court agreed to review an appellate court decision that will require the Court to answer the following question: Can money serve as consideration for a non-compete?

One of the greatest roadblocks on the path of sustainable and collective economic growth is the abuse of economic power and the collection of wealth through illicit means.

Four AMN recruiters left AMN to join Aya.

We reported last month concerning California's new non-compete law that furthers the state's protections for employee mobility and seeks to void out of state employee non-compete agreements.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Lawson expanding the class of persons protected under the anti-retaliatory provisions set forth in the SOX Act.

On 3 March 2005, the European Court of Justice ("ECJ") gave its judgment in Staatssecretaris van Financien v Arthur Andersen & Co Accountants cs.

A deferred prosecution agreement, or DPA, seems to make a lot of sense for a company under investigation by federal prosecutors.