Your search for ‘Fenwick’ returned 2,531 results

In the month of August, over half of the private investment in digital health went to infrastructure companies.

The selection of an invention for patenting must be based on the business goals and needs of the client.

On December 6, 2016, in a unanimous opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court reversed the Federal Circuit's affirmance of the damages award in Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.

The Supreme Court's decision in the TC Heartland and the Federal Circuit's decision in In re Cray have led many to wonder how the landscape of patent litigation will change.

Historically, any company that has wanted to retransmit broadcast television has been required to pay licensing fees to the broadcasters.

The patent landscape experienced a paradigm shift with the May 2017 United States Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods Group Brands.

On Monday, November 14, 2011, the Federal Circuit in Powell v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. made two significant rulings regarding patent damages and inequitable conduct.

Should intervening rights apply to claims that were not textually amended during a reexamination proceeding but were effectively narrowed by the patentee’s arguments? Following a controversial panel decision last September in Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. Hemcon, Inc. that expanded intervening rights for reexamination, an en banc Federal Circuit on March 15 ruled that intervening rights only apply if claim language is substantively amended or new claims are added.

A copyright registration is the required ticket for starting an infringement lawsuit in federal court, under 17 U.S.C. § 411

Despite plaintiff's cease and desist letters, the court found that the period of delay nonetheless continued until plaintiff filed suit.

The Supreme Court justices signaled Monday that, just like the rest of us, they are at a loss as to where to draw the patentability line for software.

The Bilski case presented the Supreme Court with an opportunity to eliminate business methods from the scope of patentable subject matter.

The Bilski case presented the Supreme Court with an opportunity to eliminate business methods from the scope of patentable subject matter.

On December 22, 2020, Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), then chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, released a discussion draft of the Digital Copyright Act of 2021 (DCA)...

As my prior post on the 2019 Revised Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance indicated, I initially anticipated only a modest uptick in allowability rates ...

Copyright law is complex and can hold a lot traps for the unwary. Oftentimes, companies could avoid these traps by taking a few simple steps.

Despite the fact that the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act has been around since 2000, the U.S. Copyright Office has refused to accept electronic signatures ...