Your search for ‘Arthur Andersen’ returned 1,106 results

On August 7, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in “Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP”, unanimously holding that Business & Professions Code section 16600 invalidated a provision in Edwards’s employment agreement that restricted him from serving customers and competing with Arthur Andersen following the termination of his employment.

The European Court of Justice has issued its decision in the Arthur Andersen/ Accenture VAT case. The decision has dealt a huge blow to insurance companies outsourcing their back office functions.

Last year, California enacted two laws that severely restrict noncompete agreements in the state. First, Senate Bill 699, now codified as Section 16600.5 of the Business & Professions Code...

On March 3, 2009, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld the trial court's determination that memoranda prepared by an accounting firm at the request of in-house counsel were protected as work product.