Your search for ‘Wiley Rein’ returned 1,873 results

Welcome to Wiley's update on recent developments and what's next in consumer protection at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and the state level.

In a win for Wiley's client, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, applying Louisiana law, affirmed the grant of an insurer's motion...

On August 15, 2024, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) published an information collection request (ICR) with respect to its proposal, first announced in May, to allow importers to request temporary...

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) remains committed to its new rules for the mitigation of orbital debris.

On Thursday, January 9 at CES 2025, two sitting FTC Commissioners – Rebecca Slaughter (D) and Melissa Holyoak (R) – sat down for a revealing discussion moderated by two former FTC Commissioners now in the private sector – Christine Wilson (R) and Julie Brill (D) – about the FTC's approach to AI.

This comprehensive newsletter covers recent consumer protection enforcement actions by the FTC, CFPB, and state Attorneys General, alongside NAD advertising challenge decisions and regulatory developments. The update examines settlements involving deceptive business practices, data breaches, and unlawful operations, while highlighting new guidance on price transparency and impersonation rules that will shape compliance strategies across industries.

WHAT: The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) issued a memorandum to provide guidance on the use of economic price adjustments (EPAs) in existing and prospective DoD contracts...

On March 25, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) issued a final rule designed to "improve, strengthen and enhance" its antidumping (AD)...

U.S. Senator Ted Cruz, Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, recently sent a letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)...

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded into products, services, and business decisions, state and local lawmakers have been considering and passing a range of ...

As the saying goes, the more things change, the more they stay the same – and the world of health care fraud enforcement is no exception. Recent years have seen a wave of novel technologies, emerging threats to our nation's health, and a regulatory and statutory regime struggling to keep up.

This comprehensive consumer protection newsletter covers recent federal and state enforcement actions, regulatory developments, and advertising challenge decisions. From major settlements involving social media companies and auto dealerships to emerging policy statements on personalized pricing and AI regulation, the update examines how agencies are addressing deceptive practices, data privacy violations, and unfair business conduct across multiple industries.

On January 21, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (EO) 14173, titled "Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity."

The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, has held that a "prior acts" exclusion in a directors and officers policy did not bar coverage for settlements reached by the insured in two related shareholder lawsuits.

In Percipient.ai, Inc. v. United States, a split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act ...

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, applying California law, has held that two former directors and officers were entitled to advancement...

The Superior Court of Delaware, applying Delaware law, has held that professional liability insurers had a duty to defend their insured against copyright infringement claims...

A federal court in Iowa ruled that an insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify a restaurant chain in an EEOC sexual harassment lawsuit because the alleged employment practices were interrelated with earlier claims that predated the policy's retroactive date. The decision turned on the court's interpretation of the policy's broad definition of "interrelated" employment practices, which required only a "common connection" among facts, circumstances, or events.