Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Fox Rothschild LLP’ returned 8,083 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Live Coverage: San Bernardino Bankruptcy Hearing With Guest Michael Sweet

    More than a year since initially filing for bankruptcy, San Bernardino, California, had a hearing to determine the city's eligibility for Chapter 9 on August 28.
    United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Looking A ‘Gift' Horse In The Mouth: The Latest On Section 363

    "Looking a ‘Gift' Horse in the Mouth: The Latest on Section 363."
    United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
Article

Ride-Through Revisited (Again) — The Strategic Use Of The Ride-through Doctrine In The Post-Catapult Era

The so-called "hypothetical test" adopted in cases such as Catapult and Sunterra has been widely criticized as potentially preventing a debtor-in-possession from continuing to use certain unassignable contracts.
United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Trial Will Decide Detroit’s Fiscal Future

    Michael Sweet was interviewed on NPR regarding the developments in the Detroit bankruptcy, as the city gears up for a trial.
    United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    With Bankruptcy Ending, Will Normalcy Return To San Bernardino In 2017?

    Michael A. Sweet was featured in the San Bernardino County Sun article, "With Bankruptcy Ending, Will Normalcy Return to San Bernardino in 2017?"
    United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    ‘Major Step Forward' For San Bernardino Bankruptcy

    Michael A. Sweet is featured in The Sun's article, "'Major Step Forward' for San Bernardino Bankruptcy."
    United StatesInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    AIG Unit Needn't Cover Horace Mann's $7M Deal, 7th Circ. Told

    Joseph E. Collins was featured in the Law360 article, "AIG Unit Needn't Cover Horace Mann's $7M Deal, 7th Circ. Told."
    United StatesInsurance
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    2 Technologies That Would Amaze My Grandparents…

    Technology is becoming more and more integrated into our daily lives and undoubtedly companies are seeking related IP protection.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Andrews Denies Motion For Attorneys' Fees Of Prevailing Party But Awards Costs

    Gregory B. Williams' blog post, "Judge Andrews Denies Motion For Attorneys' Fees Of Prevailing Party But Awards Costs" from the firm's Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation blog was featured in IPFrontline on February 24, 2016.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    After Bench Trial, Judge Sleet Concludes That None Of The Asserted Claims Of The Patents-In-Suit Are Invalid Due To Obviousness

    In Pfizer Inc., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., the Court concluded that the asserted claims of the patents-in-suit are invalid due to obviousness.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Back To Basics: The Differences Amongst Copyrights, Trademarks And Patents

    When I go to parties and describe what I do, one of the most common responses is, "Oh, so you are a patent lawyer."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Be Creative But Be Careful with Copyrights and Trademarks in Your Designs

    USA Today had a must-read article on Under Armour’s crazy uniform designs.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Can I Patent My Recipe?

    The New Food Economy answers that question (and hints: "no one likes the answer") in a new article published this week, linked here.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Chief Judge Sleet Grants Basis Science's Motion To Stay Patent Infringement Action Pending Reexamination Of Patents-In-Suit

    By Order entered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet in BodyMedia, Inc. v. Basis Science, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-133-GMS, the Court granted the motion of defendant Basis Science, Inc. to stay the action pending completion of the inter partes reexamination of the patents-in-suit, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,261,690, 6,605,038, 7,689,437, 7,285,090, and 8,073,707. By the same Order, the Court denied Basis Science’s motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of California.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Chief Judge Sleet Grants Motion To Transfer Constant Contact’s Action Seeking Declaratory Judgment That Umbanet’s Patents Are Invalid

    By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet in Constant Contact Inc. v. Umbanet Inc., Civil Action No. 12-1467 (D.Del., March 12, 2014), the Court granted defendant Umbanet’s Motion to Transfer the declaratory judgment action filed by plaintiff Constant Contact to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Defining Affiliate: Pay Attention To The Boilerplate

    When licensing a patent, soft­ware, copyrightable work, or other intellectual property, it’s common to license the property to a par­ticular entity and its "affiliates."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Five Tips For Preparing Effective Intellectual Property Assignments

    Intellectual property assignment agreements are commonly used to transfer ownership of intellectual property, registered or unregistered, from one party to another.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Andrews Grants Microsoft’s Motion For Summary Judgment In Part In Infringement Action

    By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Robocast, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, Civil Action 10-1055-RGA (D.Del., February 21, 2014), the Court granted Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment in part and denied it in part.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Andrews Issues Markman Opinion In Infringement Action Construing Seven Disputed Terms In Patents-In-Suit

    By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Richard G. Andrews in Celebrate International, LLC v. Leapfrog Enterprises, et al., Civil Action No. 14-261-RGA (D.Del., August 28, 2015), the Court issued its Markman opinion...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Article

    Judge Andrews Issues Markman Order Construing 10 Terms In Dispute In Patent Infringement Action Against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

    By Claim Construction Order entered in Power Management Solutions LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., C.A. No. 12-426-RGA-CJB (D.Del., May 30, 2013), the Honorable Richard G. Andrews construed ten disputed terms found in U.S. Patent No.5,504,909.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Fox Rothschild LLP
  • Showing 821–840 of 8083 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics