ArticleImplementation Of The Parent-Subsidiary DirectiveFranceLitigation, Mediation & ArbitrationSG Archibald Andersen
ArticleCzech News - June 1998 - Ministry Of Finance InstructionsCzech RepublicAccounting and AuditArthur Andersen
ArticleValue Added Tax - Sharing Of The Income Tax Of A Tax Consolidated GroupFranceAntitrust/Competition LawArthur Andersen
ArticleDeconsolidation Of Assets And Liabilities - SecuritisationFranceEmployment and HRArthur Andersen
ArticleAccelerated Depreciation According To The Declining Balance MethodFranceTaxSG Archibald Andersen
ArticleThe Internet - The Dispute Over Its Governance ContinuesUnited KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, EntertainmentAndersen Legal
ArticleThe Mixed Bag Of “Edwards v. Arthur Anderson”: Narrow Restraints In Non-Competition Agreements Are Not Allowed, Indemnity Rights Are Unwaivable, But Broad Releases Of "Any And All Claims" Are ValidThe California Supreme Court's recent opinion in “Edwards v. Arthur Andersen L.L.P.”, S147190 (Aug. 7, 2008), is a turning point for two distinct bodies of law surrounding the validity of post-employment restrictions, such as covenants not to compete, and the validity of broad, employment-related releases in light of nonwaivable statutory rights.United StatesEmployment and HRLittler Mendelson
ArticleCalifornia´s "Edwards v. Arthur Andersen" Decision And The Future for Employee Noncompetition Agreements And Other Post-Employment RestraintsIn a closely watched decision issued on August 7, 2008, the California Supreme Court in Edwards v. Arthur Andersen unanimously determined that a provision in an employment agreement restricting an employee from serving customers or competing with a former employer was invalid under California Business & Professions Code section 16600United StatesIntellectual PropertyMorrison Foerster
ArticleChanges in the Pension Schemes in the Banking Sector: Accounts and Financial InfFranceEmployment and HRArthur Andersen
