Your search for ‘Nossaman LLP’ returned 753 results

Institutional investors and other limited partners are often told they must accept certain terms and provisions in alternative investment fund documents because such terms "are market."

On February 15, 2023, changes to Actuarial Standard of Practice (ASOP) No. 4 will be effective, and defined benefit plans will need to comply with these new rules in all actuarial funding...

In the latest episode of Digging Into Land Use Law, Brooke Marcus and Paul Weiland discuss how "Chevron deference" has loomed large over administrative law during the past four decades. The Loper Bright decision...

According to California's projections, the miles of highways susceptible to coastal flooding in a 100-year storm event will triple from current levels to 370 miles by 2100, with over 3,750 miles...

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience, improve performance, and enable social media features. Users can manage their cookie preferences through the site's privacy policy and terms & conditions.

In this episode, Anna Tang, Nathan Guttman and Kimberly Kamkar tackle one of the most hotly negotiated provisions in M&A: sandbagging – what happens when a buyer closes a deal knowing...

In this episode of Digging Into Land Use Law, Brooke Marcus and Paul Weiland discuss the Trump administration’s rescission of the regulatory definition of “harm” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA)...

Nossaman LLP is a law firm offering comprehensive legal services across multiple practice areas. The firm provides expertise in infrastructure, real estate, environmental law, and litigation, serving clients through offices in California, Texas, and Washington D.C.

Nonprofits are playing an increasingly visible role in shaping elections, but navigating the overlapping rules of federal tax law and state campaign finance requirements can be daunting. This on-demand webinar walks through the "rules of the road" for nonprofits that want to participate in elections without jeopardizing their tax status or running afoul of disclosure laws, translating legal frameworks into practical governance and compliance strategies drawn from real-world experience.

This website uses cookies to enhance user experience, improve performance, and enable social media features. Users can learn more about data handling practices through the privacy policy and terms of service.

Given the deregulatory approach taken by the Trump administration on PFAS maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) (as detailed in Part I) and the money his administration is making available for states (as detailed in Part II), this Part III analyzes the other side of the Trump administration’s environmental federalism – what the states are doing. States have responded in varying ways to the reduced federal action for PFAS MCLs, including some acting directly in response to the Trump administration’s recent MCL changes.