Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Stark & Stark’ returned 5,644 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Public Databases Increase Qui Tam Risk For Healthcare Providers

    In 2014, CMS released two new sources of data that are intended to increase transparency related to federal payments to physicians.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    McGuireWoods LLP
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article

    The Eighth Circuit Teaches Relators: Don't Ask A Question Unless You Can Plead The Answer Under Rule 9(b)

    Earlier this summer, the Eighth Circuit was the latest circuit to weigh in on the growing split regarding what precisely a relator must plead to satisfy Rule 9(b)'s
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
  • Article

    Far-Reaching Effect Of IPR Estoppel Dooms Invalidity Defense Based On Prior Art Product

    Chief Judge Stark granted a patent owner's motion for summary judgment of inter partes review (IPR) estoppel, ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Akin
    Akin
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Patent Watch: Section 285 Does Not Extend To Recovery Of IPR Fees

    Bryson, J. The Court affirmed the Commission's determination regarding the domestic industry requirement for filing a patent suit. To satisfy the domestic industry requirement...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    WilmerHale
    WilmerHale
  • Article

    Health Care Enforcement Quarterly Roundup Q3 | September 2018

    In the latest installment of Health Care Enforcement Quarterly Roundup, we examine key enforcement trends in the health care industry that we have observed over the past few months.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    McDermott Will & Emery
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article

    Settlement By Orthopedic Group Provides 1.2 Million Reasons For Healthcare Providers To Ensure Compliance With Fraud And Abuse Laws

    A recent healthcare fraud investigation and settlement demonstrates three important reminders for healthcare providers:
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Butler Snow LLP
    Butler Snow LLP
  • Article

    When Health Care Systems And Life Science Companies Collaborate: Benefits And Key Issues

    In today's dynamic health care industry health care providers are pressed to constantly adapt and innovate at an unprecedented rate while facing major changes in the applicable reimbursement systems.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Nexsen Pruet
    Nexsen Pruet
  • Article

    What You Need To Know About The District Of Delaware Vacant Judgeship Docket

    While Delawareans are proud of the well-deserved elevation of Judge Stark to the Federal Circuit, his absence coupled with the District of Delaware's heavy caseload is forcing the Court...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Womble Bond Dickinson
    Womble Bond Dickinson
  • Article

    The BHS Saga: Stark Lessons For Company Directors

    The BHS collapse highlighted critical lessons for company directors, emphasizing the importance of due diligence, adherence to fiduciary duties, avoiding conflicts of interest, robust corporate governance, employee welfare, and proactive insolvency risk management.
    United KingdomMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    DMH Stallard LLP
    DMH Stallard LLP
  • Article

    CMS Releases Final 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule

    On Nov. 1, 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the final 2008 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). The MPFS makes a number of significant revisions to the Independent Diagnostic Testing Facility (IDTF) regulations and performance standards.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis
    Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis
  • Article

    DC Circuit Calls Into Question Legality Of Stark Law Ban On Per-Click Equipment Leases

    On June 12, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a lengthy decision calling into question the regulatory prohibition on per-click equipment leases under the federal physician self-referral law.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Dentons
    Dentons
  • Article

    Health Care Reform Alert: CMS Implements Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol Process to Self-Disclose Stark Law Violations

    Based on a Congressional mandate included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published a document entitled "CMS Voluntary Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol" (the SRDP) on its website on September 23, 2010.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Key Takeaways From The Revised And Clarified Stark Law Regulations – Part 2

    CMS made impactful changes to the Federal physician self-referral law's (i.e., Stark Law's) regulations in its Final Rule that were effective January 19, 2021
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Foley & Lardner LLP
  • Article

    OIG Issues Updated Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol

    The Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services recently released an update to its Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    McGuireWoods LLP
    McGuireWoods LLP
  • Article

    Physician Group Practices Take Heed – January 1, 2022 Deadline Approaches For Compliance With CMS' Recent Changes To Permissible "Group Practice" Compensation Methodologies

    The Final Rule will not allow a physician practice utilizing such a targeted methodology to continue to satisfy the definition of "Group Practice."
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    Sweeping Changes Proposed For Medicare And Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute And Self-Referral Rules

    On October 9, 2019, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ("HHS") Office of Inspector General ("OIG") and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS")
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
    Kirkland & Ellis International LLP
  • Article

    Courts Shift Position On Arbitration Clauses Precluding Punitive Damages

    Federal courts appear to be changing their position as to who should decide whether the preclusion of punitive damages in an arbitration clause is for the court or the arbitrator to decide. The changing law on the subject poses serious questions for businesses as to the utility of arbitration clauses. Prior case authority generally shows that federal courts were not shy about deciding whether an arbitration clause that precluded punitive damages was enforceable.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Jorden Burt LLP
  • Article

    OFAC Revokes Iran General License X: A Stark Reminder That Evolving Sanctions Require Continuous Vigilance

    On July 7, 2026, the US Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued General License X1 (GL X1), immediately revoking General License X (GL X), which had, for the first time since the 1970’s...
    GlobalGovernment, Public Sector
    Bracewell LLP
    Bracewell LLP
  • Article

    FDA Warning Letter Is A Stark Reminder That If You Claim Your Product Is RUO, It Has To Be RUO

    In vitro diagnostics, or IVDs, have a somewhat unique position among the gamut of products that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees and regulates...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    FTC Ups Payment Company's Fine After Alleged Violation Of Earlier Settlement

    The vast majority of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) cases that we cover at Ad-ttorneys@Law are over very quickly, with settlements lickety-split.
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    BakerHostetler
    BakerHostetler
  • Showing 621–640 of 5644 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics