Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Spruson & Ferguson’ returned 1,285 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Bianca-Moden GmbH & Co. KG v Bianca and Bridgett Pty Ltd [2021] ATMO 30 (15 April 2021): Opposition to trade mark registration

    Prior registration for BIANCA did not prevent the registration of the BIANCA AND BRIDGETT trade mark for the same goods.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Excesses of innovation patent damages pulled back

    The Full Federal Court has now determined that infringement cannot occur until the grant of the innovation patent.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

Singapore Court of Appeal reverses High Court decision on patent revocation jurisdiction

The Court held that the High Court has limited power to hear applications for patent revocation and to revoke patents.
SingaporeIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Electronic witnessing of documents under COVID-19

    What to do when witnessing a signature via an audio visual link under the new NSW laws.
    AustraliaCoronavirus (COVID-19)
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Australian Government looks to bring defence export controls and patents into focus (again)

    Defence export controls (limitations on exporting "sensitive" Australian technologies) and patents are closely linked.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Amendments to patent examination guidelines finalised

    Revised CNIPA Guidelines include significant changes that will affect various aspects of patent prosecutions & patent enforcement going forward.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Making use of expedited examination for cleantech inventions

    Article considers some of the pros and cons of proceeding toward accelerated patent grant in Australia for cleantech inventions.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Another New Balance victory over New Barlun: A shot in the arm for foreign businesses in China

    This decision, with hefty damages imposed, is a milestone for China's efforts to deter and combat unfair competition.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Zealand Patents Act 2013 – support means more than fair basis

    A recent IPONZ decision has confirmed that "support" requires a higher descriptive standard than does "fair basis".
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Expedited Patent Examination For "Green" Technologies

    We have reported previously on the increasing importance of "green" technologies in the world of intellectual property. In recent years, "IP buzzwords" have included superconductors, gene patents and computer software – and society’s ever-increasing environmental awareness ensures that "greentech" is the latest vogue.
    AustraliaEnvironment
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    $30m for infringement of Bayers Australian Yasmin patent – a "small" jurisdiction with big benefits

    This case set a new benchmark in Australia for future patent infringement damages claims against generic manufacturers.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Battle of the Iron Chef trade marks

    The trademark opposition was unsuccessful as the opponent failed to establish similarity between the services concerned.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Business Name vs Trade Mark | Key Differences Australian Business Owners Need To Know

    Understanding the critical distinction between business names and trade marks in Australia can save your business from costly rebranding and legal complications. While a business name simply allows you to trade, a registered trade mark provides exclusive legal protection for your brand and prevents competitors from using confusingly similar names in your industry.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Case Note: Disputed patent application: Olvey & Sketo v Danko & Gabrys [2019] APO 42

    This case highlights the importance of detailed records throughout the ideation and development stage of your invention.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Changes "Raise the Bar" for Patentability, but if Applicants Act Quickly They Can Avoid Tougher Standards

    Discussion on the significant changes to intellectual property law to be issued by the Government
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Final report recommends changes to Australian Designs legislation

    The final review report recommends changes to enhance the system and to address deficiencies in the designs legislation.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Fit Revolution Pty Ltd v Amazon Europe Core S.a.r.l. [2021] ATMO 35 - Opposition to trade mark not established

    In this matter, the opposition was insufficient to prevent the registration of the AMFIT NUTRITION trade mark.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Inevitable change to the Australian Gene Patent System progresses

    Government tables its response to Senate Gene Patents Report and previous reports into gene patenting in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Latest Innovation Statistics Reflect Poorly - But Possibly Falsely - On Australasia

    There are a number of measures of a country’s "innovativeness". When each of government R&D spend, number of academic publications, GNP, number of successful spin-off companies, etc. are reduced to a "per capita" basis, one can begin to get a feel for where the "innovation hotspots" are across the globe.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Licensors´ Obligation Not To Frustrate Licensees´ Use Of Trade Mark

    In JLCS Pty Ltd v Squires Loft City Steakhouse Pty Ltd ([2008] FCA 867, June 12 2008), the Federal Court of Australia considered two main issues. The first was the effect, if any, of a change in ownership of a restaurant to a licence to operate the restaurant under the name Squire's Loft.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 581–600 of 1285 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics