Your search for ‘Chapman Tripp’ returned 851 results

These discussion documents aim towards the implementation of the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project.

How the new Act is applied, particularly the exemption for collaborative activities, will be key.

The number of investigations into healthcare professionals illustrates the importance of competition in healthcare.

The need for thoughtful drafting of lender assignment clauses in bank loans has been underlined by a recent US judgment.

Doubts cast on the extent which directors can rely on their liability cover to pay for legal costs.

Discussion on recent Australian case on directors' duties and its implications in New Zealand

The intention to criminalise breaches of directors' duties in a NZ amendment Bill has been called "literally insane".

This Brief Counsel outlines some interesting and relevant upcoming commercial cases in the NZ Supreme Court in 2013.

Judge Jan Doogue’s vigorous defence of a director’s right to rely on specialist advice in MED v Feeney and Ors has drawn sharply different responses with some seeing it as a source of comfort for directors and others as a source of concern. This Brief Counsel summarises the key points of the decision, samples some of the reactions it has provoked and gives Chapman Tripp’s assessment of the decision’s broader significance.

Bernard Whimp’s audacious low ball offers late last year to shareholders in New Zealand’s top publicly listed companies have brought the need for law reform in this area into sharper focus.

This decision resolves a question which has been long-unsettled in UK law and brings the UK into line with New Zealand.

The Crown Minerals Amendment Act 2013 comes into force on 24 May 2013.

An overview of the Caygill Review Panel’s report into the Emissions Trading Scheme.

The FMA/RBNZ will also provide individual feedback that is specific to each bank, along with their general observations.

This is Part 9 of a detailed submission by Chapman Tripp in relation to the draft Financial Markets Conduct Bill.

Bernard Whimp has provided the Financial Markets Authority (FMA) with an easy first scalp in Financial Markets Authority v Carrington Securities LP1 and in the exercise of its new powers to deal with predatory low ball offers.

Claims alleging breaches of duty by receivers rarely come to court, so a recent and detailed High Court decision is welcome - particularly for the guidance it gives practitioners on.