Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Spruson & Ferguson’ returned 1,285 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    User pays but who gets paid? The vexed question of damages for copyright infringement

    These cases show the importance of structuring IP ownership at the outset, and considering future infringement claims.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Using AI to invent therapeutics: Should artificial intelligence be recognised for inventive activity?

    Two patent applications naming artificial intelligence as the sole inventor were refused by the European Patent Office.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Article

What's a "but for"? USPTO Proposes Changes to Duty of Disclosure

Patent applications in the US require the onerous duty of disclosure requirements.
AustraliaIntellectual Property
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Will Australia follow the US and prohibit the patenting of genes and biological material?

    A decision is expected later this year from the Australian High Court in D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Malaysian Court of Appeal grants pre-emptive non-infringement declaration under the Own Name doctrine

    The decision provides commercial certainty and upholds integrity to use one's personal name or identity in their trade.
    MalaysiaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    A tale of pipe & fittings trade marks across the cities

    Businesses across the world can safeguard their rights by early registration of their trade marks locally and overseas.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Does Registration of 2-D Mark Under Old Law Confer 3-D Mark Protection Under New Law? Law Governing Shape Marks Considered in Landmark Infringement Case

    The Singapore High Court has recently delivered a judgement clarifying, among other things, the legal position concerning shape marks.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    Impact of Deficient/Incomplete International Preliminary Examination Reports on the Validity of Singapore Patent Applications

    Under the Singapore Patents Act as applicable to international patent applications entering into the Singapore National Phase via PCT Chapter II with international filing dates before 1 July 2004, a patent application may proceed to grant provided that the Patent Office receives a copy of the International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER).
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    Multi-Class Registration Available in Singapore from 2 July 2007

    Currently, an applicant who wishes to register a trade mark in more than one class of goods and/or services must file separate applications for each class. However, this will change with effect from 2 July 2007.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    "POLO" Infringement Claim Rejected by Singapore Court

    The Singapore High Court has recently rejected an infringement claim made by the famous American fashion house, Polo/Lauren Company, LP (the plaintiff), against a local fashion retailer, Shop In Department Store Pte Ltd (the defendant).
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
    Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson
  • Article

    Singapore Patent Office denial of post grant amendments in revocation hearing founded on undue delay and unfair advantage

    Discussion of factors that led to decision to refuse to allow post grant amendments to a patent.
    SingaporeIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    How to calculate patent expiry dates in the United States

    The article explains the issues, and the commonly held view of how to calculate straightforward US patent expiry dates.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Allowability of provisos in patent claims under Australian Patent Law

    The main test for allowing an amendment is if it adds new information about the invention.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New Draft Trade Mark Law Strengthens Brand Protection

    The draft law takes aim at the widespread use of "registered but not used" marks, which have been difficult to eliminate in China.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    An Australian first: opposition to a surrender of a patent

    This recent APO decision demonstrates that it is indeed possible to successfully oppose a surrender of a patent.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    The 2026 Pharmaceutical Patent Review

    Australia's pharmaceutical patent landscape has reached a critical juncture, with appellate courts reconsidering fundamental principles of patent scope, term extensions, and remedies that will shape originator-generic disputes for the foreseeable future. As the High Court prepares to rule on patent term extensions for formulation patents and new Federal Court practice directions take effect, the strategic calculus for both innovators and generic entrants is being fundamentally rewritten.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Legal 500 country guide I Patent litigation in Australia

    Link to country-specific Q&A which provides an overview of Patent Litigation laws & regulations applicable in Australia.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Should the Australian Patent Office be denying patent eligibility to cDNA inventions?

    The Patent Office may have an opportunity to reconsider patent eligibility of cDNA with consistent examination practice.
    AustraliaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    Direct registrations – Second level .au domain names delayed but coming

    The launch of direct registrations in Australia is delayed and is now likely to take place in the first half of 2020.
    AustraliaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    New mandatory data breach laws for Australia – what does it mean to organisations trading in Australia?

    The new laws will cover most Australian Government agencies and many private sector and not-for-profit organisations.
    AustraliaPrivacy
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Showing 561–580 of 1285 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics