Your search for ‘Fenwick’ returned 2,530 results

In a far-reaching and favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes barred the "most expansive class action ever" as lacking evidence of the "common policy of discrimination" necessary for class treatment.

On November 28, 2013, the European Commission issued a proposal for a directive "on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information against their unlawful acquisition, use, and disclosure."

Some of the most significant changes to the trademark law system in the European Union since its establishment in 1996 went into effect earlier this year.

With big data analysis, SEC investigators can more easily zero in on potential accounting or reporting violations even before a company's outside auditors or management ever do.

The order also applies limits to purportedly divisive DEI training within the military and federal agencies, and with respect to federal grant recipients.

The government has increasingly focused its FCPA enforcement firepower on individuals.

Reversing a trial court’s decision, a California Appeals Court in "Cheal v. El Camino Hospital" held that a former employee may present her age discrimination claim to a jury.

A federal district court in California held that whether LinkedIn contact information can be an employer's trade secret is a factual dispute that must be decided by a jury.

California's Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (Cal-OSHA) has released proposed revisions to its COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS).

Governor Brown signed into law the Healthy Workplaces, Healthy Families Act of 2014, which requires all California employers to provide employees paid sick leave.

In "Hatai v. Dept. of Transportation", a California court of appeal upheld a trial court's decision to exclude "me too" evidence of discrimination from individuals outside of the plaintiff's protected class.

In a case of first impression, a California court of appeal has applied the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to significantly expand the leave rights of employees disabled by pregnancy.

A California appellate court expressly rejected a "narrow restraint" exception to California’s non-compete statute, an exception relied on by federal courts to enforce non-competes against California employees where the restraint excludes an employee from a narrow portion of his or her profession.

The California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, imposing a simplified but more burdensome test that businesses ...

On the same day that the California Supreme Court issued Iskanian, another important ruling with respect to class action arbitration waivers was issued by the Ninth Circuit.

In another favorable ruling for employers, the Supreme Court in "University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar" clarified that employees must satisfy a higher "but for" standard of proof to prevail in a Title VII retaliation claim.

A California appellate court upheld a jury’s verdict that the USF lawfully terminated a professor who refused to undergo a fitness-for-duty examination.