Your search for ‘Stark & Stark’ returned 5,640 results

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. Stark in GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc., Civil Action No. 12-1318-LPS (D.Del., July 12, 2016) (redacted), ...

On November 20, 2020, CMS issued its Final Rule (the "Final Rule") modifying various Stark Law regulations, including those specifically geared toward real estate arrangements.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently issued an advisory opinion under the federal physician-self referral law (the "Stark Law")

Last week, regulators released proposed rules that, if adopted, would provide healthcare stakeholders with much needed regulatory relief as the industry moves toward a value-based payment system.

Earlier this month, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

On October 9, 2019, the OIG and the CMS simultaneously released proposed rules revising the AKS and Stark Law, respectively.

On August 27, 2007, The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the third phase of rulemaking to amend the regulations implementing the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act, commonly known as “Stark”.

On November 16, 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services published the most significant changes to the physician self-referral law regulations since 2008.

On November 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") released the long-awaited final rule to modernize and clarify the Stark Law.

In addition to ownership of ancillaries, these practices have significant relationships with other providers, most especially hospitals.

On October 9, 2019, the Department of Health and Human Services announced proposals for a number of new and revised exceptions to the Stark Law and safe harbors for the Anti-Kickback Statute that are intended ...

On January 12, 2005, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission ("MedPAC"), an independent Congressional advisory panel, voted to recommend that Congress adopt a series of policy changes to promote more effective use of imaging services covered by the Medicare program. The recommendations range from the establishment of federal standards for providers who bill Medicare for performing or interpreting diagnostic imaging services, to an expansion of the "Stark" physician selfreferral restrictions for

Effective January 1, 2011, referring physicians (non-radiologists) who provide MRI, CT, and PET scans in their office practices will be required to make certain disclosures and provide information to their Medicare patients or risk violation of the Stark Law.

On April 20, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an important ruling that will significantly affect the ability of physicians to challenge the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) regulations under the federal physician self-referral law, more commonly referred to as the “Stark Law.”

Alimony in New Jersey is subject to modification, suspension or even termination if an alimony payor can show that their former spouse is cohabitating.

Health care providers have long struggled with the issue of how to deal with the discovery that they have been involved in violations of the Stark law.

On March 15, 2017, the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, ruling on cross motions for summary judgment in U.S. ex rel. Tullio Emanuele v. Medicor Associates Inc. et al.

In July of this year, the US Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed significant changes to the regulations implementing the federal physician self referral law.