The Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) recently released an important award confirming the WSIB policy that bicycle couriers and foot couriers are considered workers . . .

In Rolley v. MacDonell, the defendant brought a motion for leave to rely on surveillance video recordings as substantive evidence. Three rounds of surveillance were carried out over a period of one year.

In a decision on a preliminary issue released September 7, 2017, Vice Chair Trojek of the LAT held that a catastrophically impaired Applicant missed the two year limitation period to dispute ...

In the recent decision of M.P. v. Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company, the License Appeal Tribunal has tackled the issue of whether attendant care expenses are incurred where a claimant's "professional" attendant care provider is also a family member.

The Supreme Court instructed that summary judgment must be granted where there is no genuine issue requiring a trial.

The Court of Appeal upheld Broad J.'s decision and provided helpful guidance for LTD insurers.

In Mabe Canada Inc. v. United Floor Ltd., the Ontario Court of Appeal weighed in on the standard of care in the context of contractual duties and industry practices.

FSCO Director's Delegate Feldman has reversed an arbitration decision and has found that a child who fell off a parked fire truck at a birthday party was involved in an "accident".

I don't think there's a better way to say "I love you" than to give that special someone their very own copy of Auto Insurance Coverage Law in Ontario.

In Sacks v. Ross, the Ontario Court of Appeal dealt with how to apply the causation test in medical negligence cases involving multiple tortfeasors.

An interesting question was put before Adjudicator Cynthia Pay at the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") recently.

The recent LAT decision of S.G. and Unifund, 16-000879/AABS by Adjudicator Anna Truong should be seen as a win for proper procedure and that the LAT will follow the Heath analysis of non-earner benefits.

The year 2016 was not all that bad: The Superior Court finally provided some much needed guidance on whether an insurer can recover an overpayment made to an insured under the SABS.

The Ontario Superior Court of Justice has recently found that there is no time limit to elect to proceed with an appraisal pursuant to Section 148 of the Insurance Act.

On August 26, 2015, the Ontario Legislature filed Bill 251/15, which amends the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule in a number of remarkable ways.

It has long been unclear from the attendant care provisions in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule whether the "economic loss" component of the "incurred" definition need only be proven once to generate benefit entitlement . . .

Another insurer has entered into Ontario's ridesharing insurance market.

On June 18, 2015, the Digital Privacy Act received Royal Assent and is now law in Canada.

In Benson v. Belair, an Ontario resident fell off the back of an All-Terrain Vehicle in Fort Nelson, British Columbia.

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released a decision dealing with whether an owner of an ATV can be held vicariously liable for a driver's negligence, even though no consent was given to operate the vehicle.