The Calcutta High Court's ruling in Jainco Projects (India) Limited v. UCO Bank examines critical procedural questions surrounding SARFAESI appeals, specifically addressing the requirements for pre-deposit when One Time Settlement orders are involved. This decision has significant implications for borrowers challenging debt recovery actions and banks enforcing security interests under the SARFAESI Act.

The Calcutta High Court's ruling in Jainco Projects (India) Limited v. UCO Bank examines critical procedural requirements for SARFAESI appeals, specifically addressing the interplay between One Time Settlement orders and mandatory pre-deposit provisions. This decision clarifies when borrowers can challenge debt recovery actions and what financial obligations must be met before appellate tribunals will hear their cases.

In this episode of the Legal Podcast bite powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Saijeet Mohanty explores the complex legal treatment of hybrid financial instruments such as Compulsorily Convertible Debentures...

In this episode of the IndiaLaw LLP Podcast, hosts Riddhi Agarwal and Ayushi Doshi break down the fine print behind arbitration clauses.

In this edition of Podcast Bites, powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Apnatva examines the Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal’s decision in M/s DLF Limited v. Gautam Ranavery, which reiterates the mandatory nature of the pre-deposit requirement for promoter appeals under Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

Maharashtra's 2025 amendments to the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code introduce a transformative change in land conversion procedures by eliminating the requirement for separate...

In this episode of the IndiaLaw LLP Legal Podcast, hosts Divy and Nidhi Singh unpack the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 — a landmark legislation reshaping India's property market.

In this episode of the Legal Podcast bites powered by IndiaLaw LLP, Our host Aryaveer khanna examine the Credit Information Companies and Internal Ombudsman Directions...

The Supreme Court of India addresses a critical case involving wrongful attribution of criminal antecedents to a citizen during bail proceedings, examining the State's accountability when false records impact fundamental rights. The judgment scrutinizes the government's explanation of a "computer error" and establishes important precedents for protecting personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Reserve Bank of India has introduced a revised pidend framework on March 10, 2026, replacing the earlier 2025 directions and redefining how banks determine shareholder payouts.

DPDP Act Decoded: Navigating the Road to Enforcement" – This webinar offers a clear roadmap to compliance with India's Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act.

In L.K. Prabhu (Through LRs) v. K.T. Mathew & Ors., the Supreme Court of India clarifies the true scope of attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC, holding that such attachment can apply only to property owned by the defendant at the time of filing the suit. The Court emphasises that this remedy is purely protective and cannot be used to unsettle prior, completed transfers.

The Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, 2020 (OSH Code) represents a major reform in India's labour law framework, consolidating thirteen central enactments into a unified compliance regime.

In this episode of Podcast Bites powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Aarya Singh discusses the Karnataka High Court’s judgment in Usha N. Swamy v. M. Venkataswamy, which examines an important issue in Hindu family...

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 empowers consumers with six fundamental rights, ensuring fairness, transparency, and protection against exploitation.

In Anwar Hussain v. State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court of India delivers a strong message on state accountability and protection of personal liberty under Article 21. The Court found that false criminal antecedents were wrongly attributed to the petitioner in a bail matter, rejecting the State’s “computer error” explanation and calling it a serious lapse affecting a citizen’s liberty.

In this episode of the Legal Podcast Bite powered by IndiaLaw LLP, host Ishika Soni discusses a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India, clarifying the limits of post-retirement disciplinary proceedings...

The Ministry of Power, Govt. of India, has introduced key guidelines to standardize battery swapping and charging infrastructure, aiming to accelerate EV adoption and promote sustainability.

Does a regulatory body like the Reserve Bank of India have the power to halt the enforcement of an international court decree?

Can a Power of Attorney transfer property ownership?