Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Transformation: Changing Ahead Of the Curve

    Many companies wait too long to attempt transformations, doing so only when the signs of trouble have become obvious. But that's almost inevitably too late. High performers, by contrast, change before they must, knowing that the best way to transform is from a position of strength
    GlobalStrategy
    Accenture
    Accenture
  • Article

    Executive Compensation in the 2005 Disclosure Season and Beyond

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has significantly changed the environment in which public companies operate. Part of this shifting landscape includes the SEC’s intensified interest in reviewing public company disclosures in the executive compensation arena.
    United StatesStrategy
    Vedder, Price P.C.
    Vedder, Price P.C.
  • Article

    White Collar Roundup - January 2014

    Kevin Loughrin was prosecuted for stealing and altering checks, using them to purchase items at retail stores, and then returning the items to the stores for cash.
    United StatesCriminal Law
    Day Pitney LLP
    Day Pitney LLP
  • Article

    Indian Nations Law Update - August 2022

    In Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians v. California, 2022 WL 2978615 (9th Cir. 2022), five California tribes sued the State of California, contending that the State failed...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
    Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
  • Article

    Financial Stability Board Designates Nine Global Insurance Groups As "Global Systemically Important Insurers"

    The Financial Stability Board (FSB), tasked by the G-20 to prevent a future financial crisis, on July 18, 2013, designated nine large insurance groups as Global Systemically Important Insurers ..
    United StatesInsurance
    Duane Morris LLP
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Article

    Recent Developments on Disclosure of Executive Compensation and Perquisites

    For the 2005 proxy season, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has increased its focus on what it views as an historical departure from generally required standards of disclosure of executive compensation among public companies. In August 2004, the SEC adopted new Form 8-K rules that significantly affect how and when public companies report material definitive agreements, including agreements related to compensation.
    United StatesStrategy
    Morrison Foerster
    Morrison Foerster
  • Article

    Foreign Investment Structure Seen As A 'Colorable Device' And Held Illegal

    Bombay High Court evaluates a downstream FDI structure to rule that investment in the holding company was a 'sham' structured to invest downstream by way of redeemable instruments.
    IndiaGovernment, Public Sector
    Nishith Desai Associates
    Nishith Desai Associates
  • Article

    OTS Authorizes Federal Savings Bank To Establish A Subsidiary Bank In China January 2008

    On December 6, 2007, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) approved the application of GE Money Bank, a federal savings bank headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah, to establish an operating subsidiary in the People’s Republic of China
    United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
    Morrison Foerster
    Morrison Foerster
  • Article

    Competition Law | September 2024 - Miscellaneous

    CCI releases market study on the diagnostic medical imaging equipment industry in India...
    IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
    JSA Advocates & Solicitors
    JSA Advocates & Solicitors
  • Article

    Exemption From Notifying Within 30 Days: Belated Blessings!

    The Ministry of Corporate Affairs has notified a significant amendment on 29 June 2017 regarding the time-period within which a transaction is to be notified to the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
    IndiaAntitrust/Competition Law
    Khaitan & Co.
    Khaitan & Co.
  • Article

    The Federal Circuit Stays The Course In Patent Ineligibility For An Abstract Idea

    Even if § 282 did not extend to a § 101 eligibility challenge, such a challenge would still be a defense to a claim of infringement.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Oblon
    Oblon
  • Article

    Focus on what words say: WA Court of Appeal confirms parental company guarantees not as good as cash

    This decision reinforces the importance of taking the correct approach to the construction of commercial instruments.
    AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • Article

    Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): Israel Beware – Trends In Enforcement

    As Israeli individuals and companies continue to have a significant impact on the international marketplace, their exposure to FCPA investigations and liability is likewise enhanced.
    IsraelCriminal Law
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
  • Article

    Focus Antitrust - 9 March 2010

    COMP/M.5754: Alstom Holdings/Areva T&D Transmission activities – manufacture and supply of equipment and services for power generation and rail transport, transmission and distribution of high voltage electrical power.
    United KingdomAntitrust/Competition Law
    Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
    Charles Russell Speechlys LLP
  • Article

    Gamut Of Section 48 Of The Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 : A Case Study

    The New York Convention of 1958 to which India is a signatory, specifies that an Arbitral Judgment might inter alia be refused enforcement if it is in disagreement with the public policy of the country...
    IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    S&A Law Offices
    S&A Law Offices
  • Article

    Court Upholds GE's Attorney-Client Privilege Amidst Government Challenge

    On September 15, 2015, the United States District Court, District of Connecticut rejected most of the Government's challenges to privilege claims asserted by General Electric Company ("GE").
    United StatesTax
    A&O Shearman
    A&O Shearman
  • Article

    ERISA Litigation Update - January 2026

    Welcome to Goodwin's ERISA Litigation Update. Litigation involving ERISA-governed benefits plans has exploded in recent years.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Goodwin Procter LLP
    Goodwin Procter LLP
  • Article

    ERISA Litigation Update

    Welcome to Goodwin's ERISA Litigation Update. Litigation involving ERISA-governed benefits plans has exploded in recent years.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Goodwin Procter LLP
    Goodwin Procter LLP
  • Article

    GE/Honeywell Appeal: The Commission Wins a Battle, but Did It Lose the War?

    On December 14, 2005 the Court of First Instance (“CFI”) finally rendered its judgments on the appeals against the European Commission’s 2001 decision prohibiting the proposed merger between Honeywell International and General Electric Company (“GE”). There is no possibility of resurrecting the original transaction, and the appeal was brought as a matter of principle. Although the CFI has affirmed the Commission’s decision, this may well be a pyrrhic victory. On the controversial issues – ver
    United StatesTransport
    Morrison Foerster
    Morrison Foerster
  • Article

    Second Circuit Decides 1983 State Court Order Is a QDRO

    United StatesStrategy
    Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
    Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP

Showing 41–60 of 87 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters