Your search for ‘Patterson’ returned 1,157 results

The U.S. Labor Department (DOL) often sets its sights up the food chain, focusing enforcement efforts on general contractors (GCs) for the wage violations of their subcontractors.

Under a recent amendment to the New York City Administrative Code, it is now unlawful to discriminate against job applicants based on their unemployment status.

The Supreme Court, in its decision in "United States v. Windsor", recently overturned Section 3 of the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.

The Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) provides for a series of disclosures between a biosimilar applicant and the innovator company, commonly referred to as the "patent dance."

The new draft document follows a previous draft Q&A document from February 2012 and a final document released in April 2015.

The Purdue decision took a very practical approach and focused on whether the perceived uncertainty in the meaning of the disputed term ultimately created impermissible fuzziness concerning the scope of the invention.

In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit in LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Tech. Operations LLC, 102 F.4th 1280 (Fed. Cir. 2024) has overruled the long-standing Rosen-Durling test...

In a recent decision, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of claims involving legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty.

Well before the California Attorney General's power to enforce the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) commenced on July 1, 2020, as we have recently reported, private plaintiffs had already jumped into the fray,

After a last-minute deal to avoid the fiscal cliff was passed by Congress on January 1, 2013, President Obama signed into law the new American Taxpayer Relief Act ("ATRA 2012") on January 2, 2013.

The Food and Drug Administration is stepping up its game with respect to the cybersecurity of medical devices.

In Patterson v. Meta Platforms, Inc., the New York Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held in a split decision that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("Section 230")––a federal statute that prohibits treating providers of "interactive computer services" as publishers of third-party content ––barred tort causes of action that sought to hold several social media companies liable for their algorithmic content recommendations.

We recently wrote about the Second Circuit's June 30, 2015 decision affirming Judge Denise Cote's decision that Apple conspired with five publishing companies to raise the price of e-books.

The DOJ invited public comment on whether to modify its consent decrees with the music licensing firms ASCAP and BMI to respond to changes in the digital music business.

In her decision, Judge Schofield described the allegations as involving "a long-running conspiracy among the world’s largest banks to manipulate the benchmark rates in one of the world’s largest markets."

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), on April 2, 2013, outlined a new disclosure position that clarifies that public companies can use social media outlets like Facebook and Twitter to announce key information in compliance with Regulation Fair Disclosure (Regulation FD).

Just such a proceeding has resulted in a recent decision by Bankruptcy Judge Michael Wiles on the legal impact of Covid-19 and its consequences on a real estate purchase contract.