Your search for ‘Patterson’ returned 1,157 results

Most companies that experience a loss at trial ask the lawyers who represented them at trial to also handle the appeal.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued interpretative guidance on the evolving use of company websites for dissemination of information.

The parties in Amgen v. Sandoz have now taken their case to the Federal Circuit on an expedited schedule.

The Bankruptcy Code enables a trustee to set aside certain transfers made by debtors before bankruptcy. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 544, 547, 548.

In United States v. Archer, the Second Circuit (Walker, Sullivan and Nathan, sitting by designation) reversed the grant of a Rule 33 motion for new trial in the Southern District of New York to...

Earlier this week an administrative law judge ruled in favor of the FTC in its closely watched trial against Pom Wonderful, finding that years of advertising by Pom Wonderful falsely exaggerated the health benefits of pomegranate juice and dietary supplements.

This decision provides guidance to small businesses on when to include casual workers in the total number of employees.

Development of a well-designed corporate compliance program, to guard against anti-competitive actions, has long been considered a worthwhile endeavor for any corporation.

We’ve previously written about Motorola Mobility v. AU Optronics, currently pending in the Seventh Circuit.

The DOJ dealt United its latest regulatory blow on Tuesday after it filed suit to prevent United from renting 24 slots—Federal Aviation Administration takeoff and landing authorizations—at Newark Liberty International Airport.

After six weeks of trial and two days of deliberation, the jury has returned its verdict in favor of the defendants in In re: Nexium.

We have been following developments in People of the State of New York v. Actavis, the New York Attorney General's "product hopping" suit against Actavis and its subsidiary, Forest Laboratories LLC.

Portions of a reverse payment suit against Endo Pharmaceuticals and others were recently dismissed by Judge William H. Orrick of the Northern District of California.

The intersection of IP and antitrust has always been fraught.

The court explicitly held that evidence of market manipulation by a dominant player in a commodities market could be enough to prove market power.

Trial is set for October 13th on an antitrust class action lawsuit alleging that Cox Communications used its monopoly power over premium cable services in Oklahoma City...

The current debate over whether Amazon holds the power of a monopolist or a monopsonist is likely to be narrowed to one question in a court room: What is the relevant product market that Amazon is allegedly dominating?

A landmark decision from the Illinois Appellate Court has opened the door for legal malpractice claims based on a "lost opportunity," even in a lottery system.