Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    U.S. Supreme Court Affirms The Rule That Patent Infringers Must Prove Invalidity Defense By Clear And Convincing Evidence

    On Thursday, the Supreme Court affirmed the long-standing rule that in asserting patent invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 282 as a defense to an infringement action, an alleged infringer must prove the patent invalid by clear and convincing evidence.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Court Holds That The Business Judgment Rule Does Not Apply To Protect The Decisions Of Corporate Officers In California

    In a recent decision of importance to all corporate officers doing business in California, a federal district court applying California law has rejected the argument that corporate officers are shielded from personal liability by the Business Judgment Rule ("BJR").
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Superior Court Affirms Dismissal Of Paxil Birth Defect Case Lacking Proximate Causation

    In its March 4, 2013 non-precedential decision in Pettit v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, No. 850 EDA 2012, the Pennsylvania Superior Court (applying Ohio law) affirmed an order of Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Sandra Mazer Moss granting summary judgment to GlaxoSmith- Kline (GSK) in a case alleging that the GSK-manufactured antidepressant medication Paxil caused birth defects.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Manufacturers And Suppliers Win Big In Pennsylvania Economic Loss Doctrine Argument

    The economic loss doctrine (ELD) in Pennsylvania "precludes recovery for negligence 'if the plaintiff suffers a loss that is exclusively economic, unaccompanied by an injury to either property or person.'"
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Eighth Circuit Opens Circuit Split On The Scope Of The Equal Credit Opportunity Act

    The Equal Credit Opportunity Act makes it unlawful for any creditor to discriminate against any applicant on the basis of marital status.
    United StatesConsumer Protection
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Seventh Circuit Confirms That The FCRA Preempts State Common Law Claims

    The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) imposes responsibilities on those who "furnish information to consumer reporting agencies."
    United StatesConsumer Protection
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Amendment To Philadelphia Ordinance Would Expand Protection Of Pregnant Employees

    On October 3, 2013, three Philadelphia City Council members introduced legislation amending Chapter 9-1100 of The Philadelphia Code, entitled "Fair Practices Ordinance: Protections Against Unlawful Discrimination" that, if passed, would significantly expand protection of pregnant employees from workplace discrimination.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    EEOC Challenge To CVS Severance Agreement Dismissed Due To Agency’s Failure to Engage in Conciliation

    Late last year the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) sued CVS in the Northern District of Illinois claiming that the retail pharmacy's standard form severance agreement and release violated Title VII.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    PHRC Clarifies That It Will Accept Allegations Of Sex-Based Discrimination Based On Sexual Orientation, Transgender Identity, Gender Transition, Gender Identity And/Or Gender Expression

    On August 2, 2018, the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission issued two guidance documents clarifying that the Commission will accept for investigation charges that allege discrimination based on sex ...
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Uber Driver Compensation Claims Survive Summary Judgment In EDPA

    On September 13, U.S. District Judge Michael Baylson of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied Uber's motion for partial summary judgment in Razak v. Uber Technologies.
    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Nationwide Class Allegations Dismissed Due To Plaintiff’s Lack Of Standing In Lender-Placed Insurance Case

    In Lauren v. PNC Bank, N.A., a judge in the Western District of Pennsylvania dismissed nationwide class allegations in an action challenging lender-placed insurance practices.
    United StatesFinance and Banking
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    PHH Mortgage Settles Lawsuit With States For $45 Million

    PHH Mortgage Corporation, the ninth largest residential mortgage servicing company in the country, agreed Wednesday to pay over $45 million to settle claims brought against it by the Attorneys General...
    United StatesFinance and Banking
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Fatal Accident In Portland Terminal Leads To Drawn-Out Insurance Dispute Regarding Tender And Duty To Indemnify

    The estate of the decedent filed a survival and wrongful death action in the King County (WA) Superior Court, naming both Huntleigh and Alaska Airlines as defendants.
    United StatesInsurance
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Supreme Court Clarifies Application Of Final Judgment Rule In MDL Proceedings, But Uncertainty Remains

    On January 21, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Gelboim v. Bank of America Group.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    United States Supreme Court Reverses California Decision Adopting "Sliding Scale" Specific Jurisdiction

    We thought you might be interested in today's U.S. Supreme Court decision Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    District Of Utah Dismisses Passenger's Negligence And Breach Of Contract Claims After Beverage Cart Injury As Preempted Under The Airline Deregulation Act

    In January 2019, a beverage cart struck Plaintiff during service on a SkyWest flight from Portland, Oregon to Dallas, Texas.
    United StatesTransport
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Federal Courts Continue Scrutiny Of Removals From State Courts

    A federal district court's recent opinion in Dietz v. AVCO Corporation reminds defendants to comply strictly with applicable statutes when removing actions from state court.
    United StatesTransport
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Federal Judge Holds That An Airline Passenger Injured In Sweden Cannot Sue In New Jersey

    After some time passed, an agent at the gate for Plaintiff's connecting flight requested that Plaintiff approach the counter.
    United StatesTransport
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Illinois Appeals Court Cites Crash Occurring In Illinois In Finding Personal Jurisdiction Properly Exercised Over Out-Of-State Defendant

    Whether done intentionally or not, it is important to recognize this tactic and stop it before it contaminates the jurisdictional inquiry.
    United StatesTransport
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Article

    Third Circuit Affirms Ruling That General Aviation Revitalization Act ("GARA") Does Not Shield Continental Motors From Liability

    In 2010, Daniel Snider died after the aircraft in which he was a passenger crashed due to an engine failure.
    United StatesTransport
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Showing 221–240 of 1078 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters