Innovation Ventures LLC has maintained an energetic growth rate for sales and revenues on the strength of its category-buster energy booster product.

As of January 2017, the Coalition for Affordable Drugs, a company formed by a hedge fund manager and the founder of a patent monetization entity, has filed forty petitions for inter partes review.

Too much sweetness can be cloying, and there's nothing like a copyright suit to bring a little sourness to the table.

The Federal Circuit ruled that a patent claim relating to a means for configuring a computer memory for improved data storage and retrieval according to a specific logical model was not directed to an abstract idea.

The Supreme Court's opinion will address these two points and could impact long-standing precedent.

"Flip for the lip"? Sure. But try to take a bite out of this trademark, and you may get a shock.

In two opinions issued on June 2, 2014, the Supreme Court rejected the Federal Circuit's claim definiteness and indirect infringement tests, and reversed the Federal Circuit's holding in each case.

On April 19, 2013, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) published Final Rules of Practice and Procedure (78 Fed. Reg. 23474-487).

Star Athletica and Varsity Brands each manufacture and sell cheerleading uniforms and warmup suits.

Resource scarcity, high commodity prices, challenging environments, and regulations all drive R&D in the oil and gas industry.

On October 7, 2016, the en banc Federal Circuit reversed a panel decision issued earlier this year and reinstated the district court's decision on multiple issues in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co., Appeal No. 2015-1171 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2016).

On Monday January 4, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in a pair of appeals—Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and AstraZeneca AB v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.—that may potentially clarify how personal jurisdiction in litigation under the Hatch-Waxman Act is impacted by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman.

In September 2014, the Federal Court of Australia considered the patentability of isolated nucleic acid sequences (DNA or RNA).

The Federal Circuit, in an en banc decision, held that to be "on sale" under pre-AIA § 102(b), a product must be the subject of a commercial sale or offer for sale.

Dish's fight with broadcast networks could help determine the future of TV advertising.

On December 5, 2013, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 3309, a bill entitled the Innovation Act. This bill has wide-sweeping provisions that, if enacted into law by passage of a similar bill pending in the Senate and with approval of the President, will profoundly alter the manner in which patent infringement actions are litigated.

On March 22, 2017, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a 6-2 ruling in Star Athletica, L.L.C. v. Varsity Brands, Inc., et al., holding the decorative elements on Varsity Brands' cheerleading...

The post-grant opposition proceeding was abolished in 2003 because it failed to demonstrate its utility over the invalidation trial, which is similar to the inter partes reexamination in the US.

Since implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, inter partes review ("IPR") and other post-grant proceedings have been used successfully to challenge and invalidate thousands of patent claims.

Pinterest is one of the fastest-growing websites of all time.