Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • News & Developments
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.’ returned 53 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    IPR Limbo During The Arthrex Decisions

    The timing of the IPR decisions underlying the Federal Circuit appeal created an unusual situation. NVIDIA challenged two patents owned by Polaris Innovations Limited...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Senators Urge Regulators To Block And Clear Patent Thickets

    Patent thickets, particularly those involving pharmaceutical patents, appear to have caught the ire of many U.S. senators.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
Article

Regeneron Disclaims An Aflibercept Formulation Patent In Response To Celltrion PGR

On March 14, 2022, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Regeneron") filed a statutory disclaimer under 37 CFR § 1.321 disclaiming all claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,857,231 B2 (the "'231 patent")...
United StatesIntellectual Property
Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Draws The Line Of Disclaimers' Binding Power

    In the Federal Circuit's recent decision of CUPP Computing AS v. Trend Micro Inc., the Court made the precedential holding that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board")...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    PTAB Sanctions Non-Practicing Entity For Seeking To Abuse The IPR Process In Order To Extort Money

    Last month, in OpenSky Industries v. VLSI Technology LLC, IPR2021-01064 (Oct. 4, 2022), the Director of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a precedential decision regarding abuse of process.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    In Hunting Titan v. DynaEnergetics, Federal Circuit Affirms Precedential Opinion Panel But Avoids Ruling On A Standard For Sua Sponte Rejection Of Substitute Claims

    In 2018, Hunting Titan, Inc. filed a petition for inter partes review ("IPR") of U.S. Patent No. 9,581,422 ("the '422 patent"), which is owned by DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH, a manufacturer of industrial explosives.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Trademark For Headphones Cancelled Based On Likelihood Of Confusion

    A trademark registration for the mark PROHEAR for audio headphones and related goods has been cancelled based on a likelihood of confusion with the mark PROTEAR for similar goods.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Will The Supreme Court Take The Bait? CVSG Issued And Other Updates In The Amgen v. Sanofi Case

    On April 18, 2022, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in the Amgen, Inc. v. Sanofi, Inc. case, which involves important questions of enablement for genus claims.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction Over Skinny Label Applications: In Re: Entresto (Sacubitril/Valsartan) Patent Litigation

    On September 27, 2022, Judge Richard Andrews of the District of Delaware granted Novartis's motion to dismiss declaratory judgment ("DJ") counterclaims raised by two generic drug manufacturers...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    The World's Best-Selling Pharmaceuticals Don't Need Trademarks

    As a result of COVID, the stock market fell on its sword, then it zoomed up. During COVID, unemployment skyrocketed, only to leave us with a tight labor market.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    University Of Texas Victorious In Trademark Opposition

    The Hook 'em Horns of the University of Texas earned a big win in a recent trademark opposition proceeding. This is an interesting sports trademark case.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Increased Innovation In Decentralized Social Networks Space Spurred By Ownership Uncertainty Of Traditional Platforms

    In light of Elon Musk's recent offer to buy Twitter, Inc. ("Twitter") there has been a resurgence in the desire to develop decentralized social media platforms. In efforts to avoid being at the whim of a single company...
    United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    The Federal Circuit Wants Litigants To Assert Estoppel When Available

    Last month, the Federal Circuit's holding in Google LLC v. Hammond Dev. Int'l, Inc.[1] illustrated the importance of raising a collateral estoppel argument when the opportunity arises.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Will Divergent Copyright Laws Between The US And UK Influence Where You Do Business As An Artificial Intelligence Company?

    Spurred by the vast potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) technologies, many countries are evaluating whether existing legal frameworks for intellectual property (IP) protection...
    GlobalIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Human Creativity v. Machine Autonomy In Identifying Copyright Authors Of Generative NFTs

    Generative content is having a moment in the form of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) powered by blockchain platforms.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    The USPTO Wants More Attorneys Practicing Before The PTAB

    On October 18, 2022, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) posted two notices on Regulations.gov seeking public input on the requirements to practice before the USPTO and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Upcycling: A Question Of Law And Optics

    Great buzz resulted from the World Bank study showing that the fashion industry is responsible for about 10% of annual global carbon emissions – more than international flights...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    USPTO Extends Motion To Amend Pilot Program

    On October 4, 2022, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced that it would be extending the Motion to Amend (MTA) Pilot Program at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    Dumb Starbucks And Parody In Trademark Cases

    On Friday, February 7th, 2014, a store called "Dumb Starbucks" opened up in Los Feliz, California. Dumb Starbucks looked nearly identical to a typical Starbucks location and served coffee, frappuccinos, and lattes in cups bearing the Starbuck’s logo and the phrase "Dumb Starbucks."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Article

    What Do I Need To File A Utility Patent Application?

    For many start-up companies, the prospect of filing a patent application can be daunting. Even when a company has a potentially patentable invention, the company may be unsure...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
    Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, P.C.
  • Showing 21–40 of 53 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics