Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Another Landmark Insurance Case for Policyholders

    On January 16, 2004, the Indiana Court of Appeals resolved more important issues in favor of Indiana policyholders. In <I>PSI Energy Inc. v. The Home Insurance Company, et al</I>., Cause No. 32 A01-0204- CV-146, PSI sought coverage under its comprehensive general liability ("CGL") insurance policies for environmental liabilities at six manufactured gas plants, the last of which ceased operations in 1950.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Court Sanctions Insurer for Bad Faith Denial of Environmental Claims

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    State Tax Amnesty Available for a Limited Time

    The Indiana Legislature has enacted a Tax Amnesty Bill that offers important relief to Hoosiers with back tax problems. H.E.A. 1004, 114th Leg., (IN, 2005).
    United StatesTax
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    The 2001 Tulloch Rule: New and Revised?

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Supreme Court Expands Government´s Right to Temporarily Ban Development of Land Without Having to Pay Just Compensation

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Major Clean Water Act Decision by U.S. Supreme Court

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Recent Second Circuit Decision May Have Significant Impact on Hoosier Farmers

    A recent case should have a significant impact on Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations ("CAFOs") in Indiana and in the United States.
    United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Indiana Supreme Court Clarifies Coverage for Environmental Claims

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    IDEM´s New Enforcement Response Plan

    United StatesEmployment and HR
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Nuisance Law and Agricultural Operations in Indiana

    Common law nuisance is codified by the Indiana Code: "Whatever is: (1) injurious to health; (2) indecent; (3) offensive to the senses; or (4) an obstruction to the free use of property; so as essentially to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, is a nuisance . . . " I.C. § 32-30-6-6.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Cross-Examining the Environmental Expert

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Insurance Coverage for Agricultural Environmental Claims

    A recent agricultural case highlighted the importance of agricultural counsel having a working knowledge of insurance coverage law. After apparently receiving a complaint from a neighbor, a dairy farm was served with a temporary restraining order prohibiting its operation from applying manure.
    United StatesInsurance
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Reasonable Development: Environmental Ruling Rejects Sewer Ban

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Is Manure a "Pollutant?"

    Manure–once regarded by Indiana’s small farmers as a blessing–has become a source of strife between Indiana’s large confined animal feeding operations (CAFOs) and their suburban neighbors. Manure is produced by CAFOs in quantities far outstripping amounts seen by farmers even thirty years ago. Manure is now a regulated substance.
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Wetlands & Recent Case Law: Twin Eagle & Other Recent Decisions

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Summary Of 2004 Environmental Legislation cont´d

    Last year the Legislature passed a noncode section of law that prohibited through July 1, 2004, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") and the Air, Water and Waste Boards from adopting a new rule or policy that would be more stringent than what is established in a related federal rule or policy. This prohibition applies only to rules and policies affecting the following industries:
    United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Recent Developments in Environmental Law in Indiana

    United StatesEnvironment
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun
  • Article

    Summary Of 2004 Environmental Legislation

    Last year the Legislature passed a noncode section of law that prohibited through July 1, 2004, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") and the Air, Water and Waste Boards from adopting a new rule or policy that would be more stringent than what is established in a related federal rule or policy. This prohibition applies only to rules and policies affecting the following industries:
    United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
    Plews Shadley Racher &  Braun
    Plews Shadley Racher & Braun

Showing 21–38 of 38 results

Previous
Legal Intelligence Newsletters