Your search for ‘M Mulla Associates’ returned 103 results

A three Judge Bench of the Apex Court in its decision in Satya Pal Anand v. State of M. P. & Ors. held that in the absence of express provision under the Registration Act, 1908 or local law, it is not open to the registering authorities ...

Recently the Bombay High Court, in Tayal Cotton (P.) Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra discussed whether moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 includes criminal proceeding within its ambit.

The Bombay High Court in a recent case of Westin Sankalp Developers v. Ajay Sikand Rana and Ors., has reiterated its stand that minority or dissenting members of a co-operative housing society have no separate identity ...

The Apex Court vide its judgment dated 17th June, 2020 passed in the case of Siri Chand (Deceased) Thr. LRS. v. Surinder Singh [Civil Appeal No. 2617 of 2020]

The Apex Court in its recent decision in M/s Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd. held that the definition of a financial debt under Section 5(8) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, ...

The Apex Court in a recent decision in M/s USS Alliance vs The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.

The Apex Court vide its judgment dated 18th October, 2019 passed in the case of S. P. Misra & Ors. V. Mohd. Laiquddin Khan & Anr., held that a decree...

The Supreme Court of India in its recent Judgment dated 17th July, 2019 in Civil Appeal Nos. 5522-5523 of 2019 Gurmit Singh Bhatia V. Kiran Kant Robinson & Ors. while upholding the Order of the High Court of Chhattisgarh ...

The Bombay High Court in its recent decision in Godrej Properties Ltd. vs. Goldbricks Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. observed that it was unknown to law for an arbitral tribunal to pass an ...

The Apex Court in a recent decision in Ghanshyam v. Yogendra Rathi observed that a power of attorney is of no consequence if neither the sale deed is executed nor any action is taken by the holder of the Power of Attorney.

Let's look at a situation where a married Hindu female dies intestate leaving behind her self -acquired properties.

The Petitioner is an owner and landlord of a building situated at Mumbai ("said building"). The contesting Respondents were various tenants of the said building.

The Supreme Court held that compliance of this procedure is mandatory in nature.

The Apex Court in its decision in Kewal Krishnan vs Rajesh Kumar and Others held that if a sale deed in respect of an immovable property was executed without payment of price...

The Delhi High Court in its recent decision in Prabha Bennett v. Rohit Sharma & Anr. , reiterated the stand that in a joint bank account, following the death of the first account holder.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai in its decision in Ajay Parasmal Kothari vs Income Tax Officer 30(1)(1)1, observed that even if the assessee...

While dealing with the issue regarding the locus of a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

The Apex Court in its recent decision in The State of Punjab and Anr. Vs M/s Ferrous Alloy Forgings Pvt. Ltd. and Others , held that a sale certificate issued to the purchaser in pursuance of the confirmation of an auction sale was merely evidence of such title and did not require registration under Section 17(1) of the Registration Act, 1908.