Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Supreme Court Unanimously Reverses Fourth Circuit In Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment

    On March 25th, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Thomas, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a decision of the Fourth Circuit that had held Cox Communications contributorily...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Oppenheimer v. DCB And Associates, LLC Et Al. (D. Mass. 25-cv-10363).

    Photographer David Gordon Oppenheimer accused DCB and Associates ("DCB") (a Century 21 business) and DCB's manager and another employee of infringing his copyright in an aerial picture of Boston...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Webinar Recording: Navigating IP In 2026 – Key Developments And Strategic Outlook (Video)

    We're pleased to share the recording of our recent webinar, "Navigating IP in 2026: Key Developments and Strategic Outlook," is now available for viewing.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    AI Safety, Model Distillation And U.S.-China Talks: Key Developments Ahead Of September 24

    As artificial intelligence policy debates intensify globally, questions surrounding AI safety protocols, international oversight mechanisms, and intellectual property protections have emerged at the forefront of U.S.-China relations. The convergence of these issues ahead of high-level diplomatic meetings highlights the complex intersection of technological advancement, national security concerns, and the legal frameworks governing AI model development and deployment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. V. Pfizer Inc. (D. Mass. 22-cv-10967; Fed. Cir. 25-1427).

    The Federal Circuit affirmed a district court's invalidity ruling on Enanta Pharmaceuticals' COVID-19 treatment patent, centering on whether a provisional application's reference to "C2-C12 alkyls" provided adequate written description support for later claims covering C1 alkyls. The appeal raised critical questions about typographical errors in patent specifications and the boundaries of written description requirements when expanding chemical compound definitions between provisional and utility patent app
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Service By Alternate Means

    To initiate a complaint in federal court, a plaintiff must serve a copy of the complaint and summons on the defendant(s). Service on foreign defendants is often governed by the procedures set forth in the Hague...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Update On The Obviousness Standard For Design Patents Post-LKQ Corp.

    In 2024, the Federal Circuit's decision in LKQ Corp. v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC overturned the long-standing and rigid Rosen-Durling test for determining whether a design patent is obvious.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Thinking Globally: International Patent Filing And Inventors' Rights

    [This article is an update to an article published in December 2017. A version of this article also appeared on IP Watchdog in July 2024.]
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Thinking Globally: International Patent Filing And Inventors' Rights

    Filing a patent internationally demands attention to many considerations including subject matter, where to file, budgets, timing, translations, and local legal and procedural frameworks.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Global Design Protection Update – Hague Agreement At 100 And Recent International Developments

    November 2025 marked the 100th anniversary of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, a foundational international treaty administered...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    What Matters Under The Ordinary Observer Test: Similarities, Differences, Or Both?

    The Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently reaffirmed the standard used for design patent infringement analysis in Range of Motion Products, LLC v. Armaid Company Inc., Case No. 2023-2427 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 2, 2026).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Lando & Anastasi
    Lando & Anastasi
  • Article

    Mobile Medical Applications – Navigating Regulatory, Profitability And Patentability Issues

    And how can you best understand patentability of these applications?
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Showing 21–32 of 32 results

Previous
Legal Intelligence Newsletters