Legal 500
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions

    • Submissions

    • Future Lawyers

  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers

    • Barristers’ Sets

    • Networks

    • Interview with…

  • In-House

    • In-House Content

    • GC Powerlist

  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products

    • Legal Business

    • News & Developments

    • About us

      • Legal 500

      • FAQs

      • Marketing

      • Careers

      • Contact us

  • Comparative Guides

  • Events

  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500

  • FAQs

  • Marketing

  • Careers

  • Contact us

  • Deutschland DE

  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Data Protection policies
  • Cookies Policy
  • Supplier Code of Conduct
  • Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking Statement
  • Contact Us
  • Article

    Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc., No. 2015-1232, -1234, 1239 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2016)

    In a case concerning socket assemblies used in prosthetic hip implants, Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Ireland Ltd. (collectively "Stryker") appealed from the District of New Jersey's noninfringement ruling...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    In Re: Cree, Inc., No. 2015-1365 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 21, 2016)

    The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's ("PTAB") determination that various claims of a patent, directed to LED technology, were unpatentable as obvious.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Generic Competitor's Regulatory Issues Prompt Stay Of Lialda® Patent Litigation

    As set forth in the decision, Mylan's failure to respond to a deficiency letter received from FDA in May 2014 "raise[d] serious questions in the Court's mind as to the viability of Mylan's ANDA product as currently formulated."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Intendis GmbH v. Glenmark Pharm. Inc., No. 2015-1902 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2016)

    Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA ("Glenmark"), the filers of an Abbreviated New Drug Application ("ANDA") for a topical skin treatment...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., No. 14-1856 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 31, 2016)

    In Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., the Federal Circuit decided two issues. First, the Federal Circuit confirmed that laches can be a defense to legal relief in a patent-infringement suit.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Merck & CIE v. Watson Laboratories, Inc., Nos. 2015-2063, 2015-2064 (Fed. Cir. May 13, 2016)

    The Federal Circuit held that Merck's offer for sale more than one year prior to the patent's filing date was sufficiently definite to constitute an on-sale bar against U.S. Patent No. 6,441,168...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    The Use Of Tribunal-appointed Experts In International Commercial Arbitration: Practical Observations And A Proposal For Ensuring Fairness

    An arbitral tribunal typically possesses broad powers to set the procedures within an arbitration, including the appointment and management of its own expert to assist the tribunal with technical subjects...
    United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Successfully Defends Shire's Patents Covering Blockbuster Drug Vyvanse®

    The District of New Jersey entered a Final Judgment ending a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement lawsuit and protecting innovator pharmaceutical company Shire's blockbuster drug Vyvanse® (lisdexamfetamine dimesylate).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Cardpool, Inc. v. Plastic Jungle, Inc., No. 2014-1562 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 5, 2016)

    The PTO initiated a reexamination and deemed the amended and additional claims to be patentable, but not before the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment of invalidity due to ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Adderall Antitrust Class Has Standing Questioned At Trial

    On October 16, 2015, FLH represented Shire in a class certification hearing before Magistrate Judge Goodman in the Southern District of Florida.
    United StatesAntitrust/Competition Law
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Defends Brand Pharmaceutical Client's Blockbuster Product And Secures Affirmance From The Federal Circuit Of Summary Judgment Of No Invalidity For Four Patents

    On September 24, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment of non-obviousness of 18 claims from four patents protecting Shire's blockbuster drug Vyvanse...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Wins At Trial On Shire's Lialda® Patent

    Shire Pharmaceuticals has just achieved another victory in the enforcement of its Lialda® patent.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Can You Patent The Blockchain? That Depends...

    Can you patent your blockchain?
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Microsoft Corp. V. GeoTag, Inc., No. 2015-1140 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 1, 2016)

    The district court rejected GeoTag's assertion that Google's declaratory-judgment claims lacked sufficient detail to warrant the exercise of subject-matter jurisdiction, and granted summary judgment of noninfringement to Google.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Joseph V. Saphia And Jessica H. Zafonte Successfully Defend RSA Protective Technologies Against Two Iprs Filed By Guardiar Solutions

    The Patent Trials and Appeals Board issued two decisions denying institution of inter partes review for U.S. Patent No. 8,215,865 ("the '865 patent")...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    In Re: TC Heartland LLC, No. 2016-105 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2016)

    TC Heartland LLC ("Heartland") petitioned for a writ of mandamus to direct the Delaware District Court to dismiss or transfer the patent-infringement suit filed against it by Kraft Foods.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    Significant PTAB Decisions Regarding Chiesi's Drug Cardene

    Ready-to-use CARDENE® I.V. Premixed Injection is indicated for the short-term treatment of hypertension and is the only available FDA-approved premixed formulation of nicardipine hydrochloride.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Defends Brand Pharmaceutical Client's Blockbuster Product And Secures Affirmance From The Federal Circuit Of Summary Judgment Of No Invalidity For Four Patents

    On September 24, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment of non-obviousness of 18 claims from four patents protecting Shire's blockbuster drug Vyvanse® (lisdexamfetamine dimesylate).
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    USPTO Issues Revised Guidelines Regarding Trademark Rule Changes—Owner E-Mail Requirement Changed

    On February 15, 2020, a rule change went into effect requiring trademark Applicants and Registrants to list a working email address at the USPTO.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners
  • Article

    FLH Wins Oxtellar XR® Trial For Client Supernus

    FLH is particularly pleased to be able to protect this important Supernus franchise, which was attacked by Actavis only a few months after Oxtellar XR®'s February 2013 launch.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Haug Partners
    Haug Partners

Showing 21–40 of 175 results

PreviousNext
Legal Intelligence Newsletters