AlarMax Distributors Inc. may pursue price discrimination claims under the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) against Honeywell International Inc., a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled last week.

The head of the Department of Justice's criminal antitrust unit called Monday for greater international cooperation in limiting the cost for companies to cooperate with investigators.

On February 19, 2015, the District Court for the Eastern District of New York issued its ruling on liability in United States v. American Express.

Allegations of conspiracy to restrain trade and exclusive dealing may read like textbook antitrust claims, but if the allegations are made by a plaintiff who is not an "efficient enforcer" of the antitrust laws, the complaint is vulnerable to a motion to dismiss.

On June 30, 2014, the FTC announced in a series of orders that it would consent to Actavis PLC’s acquisition of Forest Laboratories only under certain conditions.

Defendants in the case are foreign manufacturers of capacitors, many of which are based in Japan, and their U.S. subsidiaries.

The Supreme Court has been urged to resolve a circuit split concerning the reach of the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act to foreign conduct that may affect U.S. commerce.

Whether this test will continue to hold or be further refined will need to await further litigation (or a possible further appeal of this decision).

On April 13, 2015 the Second Circuit (Hon. Walker, Raggi, Droney) heard oral argument in People of the State of New York v. Actavis PLC.

On December 1, 2014, we wrote about the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., which affirmed dismissal of the vast majority of Motorola’s claims regarding LCD panels.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear Apple Inc. v. Pepper, a major case involving antitrust standing, interested parties across the political spectrum are weighing in with their ideas of how the case should be resolved.

Last week we posted a discussion concerning effective antitrust corporate compliance programs, and provided some factors that in-house counsel should consider in developing compliance programs governing employees’ communications with competitors and dealings with customers and suppliers.

Last week, the Second Circuit weighed in again on the enforceability of an arbitration provision in Parisi v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., No. 11-5229-cv (2d Cir. Mar. 21, 2013).

A number of biosimilar makers have turned to inter partes review proceedings in order to litigate the validity of patents that cover their proposed products prior to submission of their biosimilar applications to FDA.

European competition authorities announced this week an investigation into Aspen Pharmacare's recent price hikes of five cancer drugs.

A seat at the table: this is what you likely want when your financial interests are drawn into a bankruptcy court proceeding.

In sophisticated real estate financing transactions, most prudent lenders attempt to deter borrowers from filing for bankruptcy before loans are paid ...

At least in the case of those inmates who have already filed a 2255 petition in the Second Circuit, Rehaif will not justify making a second or successive petition.

On March 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision resolving an important issue that has implications for companies seeking redress for false advertising and disparagement. In

The U.S. Department of Justice is increasing its outreach to the private sector on all things cyber. Last week, the DOJ's Criminal Division held a cybersecurity roundtable to discuss challenges in handling data breach investigations.