Ultimately, Master Jolley held that section 18 creates a rebuttable presumptive two year limitation for claims for contribution and indemnity, which is subject to the principle of discoverability.

On March 27, 2018, the Ontario Court of Appeal released a decision in the case of Tondat v. Hudson's Bay Company, 2018 ONCA 302.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the shutdown of a large portion of the global economy.

In a recent case before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, the Court was once again faced with a question surrounding the deductibility of collateral benefits in the motor vehicle accident context.

The recent Court of Appeal decision in MDS Inc. v Factory Mutual Insurance Company discusses the interpretation of standard form insurance contracts and coverage in all-risk policies.

Justice Leiper also found that it would be appropriate to award punitive damages against the school as a result of this conduct.

In December 2020, Justice Nicholson, of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ("ONSC"), released two decisions

In today's digital society, we give our personal information to organizations all of the time, sometimes unknowingly.

There has been much confusion regarding the applicability of s.7 of the Licence Appeal Tribunal Act (the "LAT Act") in recent years.

The decision in Wong v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONSC 1111, addresses an unusual scenario involving a denial of insurance coverage after the insureds lied about who was driving the defendant vehicle.

The Ontario Court of Appeal has recently released Travelers Insurance Company of Canada v. CAA Insurance Company, 2020 ONCA 382 , which addresses the extra-provincial application ...

In the recently released decision by the Court of Appeal in Moore v. 7595611 Canada Corp., 2021 ONCA 459, the Court upheld a jury award for damages for loss of care, guidance and companionship awarded to the parents of an adult child killed in a fire.

In the context of a medical malpractice case, when is a claim discoverable by a plaintiff, so as to begin the running of the limitation period?

This time last year, a rare five-member panel of the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered a decision in Douglas v. Stan Fergusson Fuels Ltd. The decision involved the intersection of subrogation and bankruptcy law.

In A.F. v. North Blenheim Mutual Insurance Company, the Executive Chair of the Licence Appeal Tribunal reconsidered two decisions where the Tribunal applied the two year limitation under s.56 of the SABS and dismissed the claims as statute barred.

In Mary Shuttleworth v. Licence Appeal Tribunal[1], a three judge panel of the Divisional Court scrutinized the internal review process for decisions of the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT).

The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Rooplal v. Foder, 2021 ONCA 357 addresses the time period that applies in unidentified motorist claims pursuant to s. 265 of the Insurance Act...

Earlier this year, I wrote an article entitled "Surprising Special Award Against Insurer" based on the case of Malitskiy v. Unica Insurance.

Yes, of course, it's the season of festive gatherings, gift-giving and all the feelings espoused in the holiday music playing overhead...

The appropriate test for causation in statutory accident benefits ("SABs") matters has been the subject of much confusion in recent years.