Your search for ‘Beijing East IP Law Firm’ returned 187 results

Recently, the Zhejiang High Court concluded a trademark infringement and anti-unfair competition lawsuit against the appellant Baoyang Liu for his involvement with the appellees...

Appraisal conclusions are professional and technical written evidences provided by appraisal institutes, thus their legality, authenticity, and probative force are usually higher than those of other civil evidences.

The latter half of Article 32 of the Chinese Trademark Law 2013 stipulates that "preemptive registration by unfair means of a trademark with certain fame already used by another party" shall not be approved.

On October 15, 2014, Rule 14 of the Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) on Several Issues concerning the Trial of Administrative Cases Involving the Granting and Determination of Trademark Right (Draft for Comment) was released by the SPC with two different opinions regarding the weight of evidence of trademark registration certificate and trademark gazette in determining copyright ownership.

On September 27, 2023, the CNIPA issued the "Guidelines on Same-Day Trademark Applications Procedures," which further clarified the examination procedures and precautions for the trademark...

Generally, the principle adopted for allocating the burden of proof in a patent infringement action is that ‘the necessity of proof always lies with the person who lays charges'.

Some Chinese equivalents for English trademarks are protected in China, while others are not.

In the Patent Examination Guidelines 2010, no specific definition is given as to a function feature; but from the context, a functional feature comprises function feature and effect feature.

The earliest Chinese regulations with regard to "examination on the disclaimer to the exclusive right to use the trademark" appeared in Trademark Examination Rules.

There is a popular saying in the online world in China: "The best way to read and understand the news is to read similar reports in tandem."

The extent of protection for an invention patent includes not only the extent determined by the technical features literally recited in the claims, but also the extent determined by the equivalent technical features.

The Beijing High Court recently concluded an administrative litigation for trademark invalidation regarding the "IDRIVEERPLUS" ("Disputed Mark") with Reg. No. 34925244.

Santak Electronics (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. ("Santak") is the registrant of the "SANTAK" mark with reg. no. 619938...

With China's rapid economic developments, the relevance of similar goods and services changes with the method of commercial trading, consumption habit, and consumer psychology.

The Beijing High Court recently concluded a final judgment on an administrative trademark invalidation dispute over the "Pigeon in Chinese" mark with reg. no. 16530290 ("Disputed Mark")...

Repetitive litigation, as a legal concept, relates to the principle of double jeopardy (non bis in idem).

Tesla Sued An Infringer For Using "Tesla Used Car In Chinese" And Was Awarded RMB 300,000 In Compensation

These Provisions are promulgated based on regulations including the Chinese Trademark Law, the Chinese Administrative Procedure Law , and in combination of trial practices.