Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

Your search for ‘Beijing East IP Law Firm’ returned 187 results

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    The Role Of The "Purpose Of Invention" Plays In Claim Construction Fujian Weizhixing Sports Goods Co., Ltd. v. Taishan Sports Industry Group Co., Ltd. Et. Al.(Article No. 1 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    According to the legislative intent, the scope of protection of a patent should comply with the contribution that the invention made to the prior art.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Jiangsu High Court Cited The Anti-unfair Competition Law To Protect Foreign Geographical Indications Across Industries

    The Suzhou Intermediate Court concluded a first instance unfair competition dispute between the plaintiff, the French National Cognac Industry Office ("Cognac Industry Office")...
    China
Intellectual Property
Beijing East IP Law Firm
Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    China 2013 Top 10 IP Cases

    Beijing EAST IP Law Firm presented China 2013 Top 10 IP Cases.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Thermostable Glucoamylase – Feasible Way To Define A New Protein Patent And Subsequently Obtained Scope Of Protection

    With reference to new protein inventions, applicants always define biological sequences by the combination of homology and function, so as to obtain a broader scope of protection.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    "Furuta In Chinese" Has Established A Corresponding Relationship With "Furuta"

    Recently, the Shanghai Intellectual Property Court concluded a trademark infringement lawsuit between Furuta Food Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. ("Furuta Shanghai")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Victorinox's "Cross And Shield" Marks Were Intentionally Infringed With Bad Faith. The Infringers Were Ordered To Pay RMB 3 Million In Compensation

    The Beijing Xicheng District Court recently concluded a trademark infringement lawsuit between Victorinox AG ("Victorinox"), Beijing Weishi Elite Trading Co., Ltd. ("Elite")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Standards For Determining An Equivalent Feature Shaohong LIU v. Junpei LIANG (Article No. 8 From "China Patent Case Review 2014" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    Only when all four elements of a feature meet the above conditions, the feature can be determined as an equivalent feature.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Standards For Suspension Of Trademark Review And Adjudication

    The CNIPA recently released the Standards for Suspension of Trademark Review and Adjudication (the "Standards") that lists the circumstances to grant a suspension for a pending trademark review case.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Inspiration On Usage Of Evidence And Application Of Grace Period For Non-Prejudicial Disclosures Yancheng Zhongwei Bus Co.,Ltd. v. NEOPLAN Bus GmbH (Article No. 28 from "China Patent Case Review 2015" by Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    Within a novelty grace period, certain pre-filing disclosures will not cause lose of the novelty of the subsequent patent application.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Top 10 Typical Bad Faith Trademark Registration Cases From The Beijing Intellectual Property Court

    On December 14, 2023, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court released its top 10 typical cases regulating bad faith trademark registrations.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Corresponding Association Between English Commercial Sign And Chinese Equivalent

    A common question regarding English commercial signs, such as trademarks, personal names, or trade names, is how to protect their Chinese equivalent.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    【Trademark】Corresponding Association Between English Commercial Sign And Chinese Equivalent

    A common question regarding English commercial signs, such as trademarks, personal names, or trade names, is how to protect their Chinese equivalent.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    A Liquor Company Infringed On Tesla's Well-Known Mark Rights And Were Ordered To Pay RMB 5 Million In Damages

    The appellant China Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. ("China F&B") and Guangdong China Food and Beverage Co., Ltd. ("Guangdong China F&B")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Schneider Electric Sued Schneider Elevator And Won RMB 40 Million In Compensation

    On February 7, 2024, the Jiangsu High Court issued a second-instance judgment in the case of Schneider Electric v. Schneider Elevator...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    China Trademark Filing Strategies – Rejection Appeals And Backup Filings

    China's trademark prosecution timelines and its ever-growing trademark database have brought genuine concerns to brand owners when considering filing new applications.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Protection For Prior Copyright In Trademark Disputes

    In the recent practice, the famous carmaker Tesla Motors, Inc. filed two civil lawsuits in China in September 2013 before Beijing Third Intermediate Court.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Agreement Between Right Holder And Infringers On How To Compensate For Repeated Infringement Can Serve As A Basis Of Determining Infringement Damage

    The People's Courts upheld that right holders and infringers could enter into an agreement on infringement damage before or after the actual infringement, which fell into the principle of autonomy of private law.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    The Application Of Prior Art Defense In Patent Infringement Litigation Yancheng Zetian Machinery Co., Ltd. V. Yancheng Greater Machinery Co., Ltd.(Article No. 15 From "China Patent Case Review 2015" By Beijing East IP Ltd.)

    Yancheng Zetian Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Yancheng Greater Machinery Co., Ltd. – the Application of Prior Art Defense in Patent Infringement Litigation (Civil Ruling (2012) Min Shen Zi No. 18 by the Supreme People's Court on July 11, 2012)
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Squatters Of "ReFa" Mark Was Ordered To Immediately Stop Filing Similar Marks For Registration

    Recently, the Ningbo Yinzhou District Court concluded a trademark infringement and anti-unfair competition dispute between MTG Co., Ltd. ("MTG")...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Article

    Admissibility Of New Evidence during Trademark Administrative Trials

    The courts have been granted the final adjudication power for administrative cases involving the authorization and confirmation of trademark rights.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
    Beijing East IP Law Firm
  • Showing 121–140 of 187 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics