The French Competition Authority announced that Nespresso has offered commitments to end an investigation into allegedly abusive and exclusive practices.

On 18 December 2017, the Paris Tribunal of Commerce condemned Orange (formerly known as ‘France Telecom') to pay € 346 million to Digicel (formerly ‘Bouygues Telecom Caraïbe') ...

On 5 October 2012, details were published concerning a 5 September 2012 decision by the German Federal Cartel Office prohibiting a proposed merger between two hospitals in Worms.

By judgment of 11 December 2012, recently published, the German Federal Court of Justice annulled the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf of 7 December 2011.

On 12 June 2018, the German Federal Court of Justice delivered a highly anticipated judgment that clarified that the suspension of the limitation period for cartel damages claims also applies to claims that arose ...

The Labour Court of Essen rejected all damages claims against the former Executive Board Member and Managing Director of a ThyssenKrupp subsidiary.

In 2014, the FCO found that, whilst not being dominant, EDEKA's market position on the procurement market in the food retail sector was strong enough for its suppliers to be economically dependent on EDEKA.

On 17 December 2013, the Regional Court of Düsseldorf dismissed a damages claim of approximately € 131 million brought by the Belgian company CDC Cartel Damages Claims SA ("CDC") against cement manufacturers Cemex Deutschland AG, Dyckerhoff AG, Lafarge Zement GmbH, Schwenk Zement KG, HeidelbergCement AG and Holcim Deutschland AG.

On 28 January 2015, the Italian Competition Authority ("ICA") fined ten ferry services operators, active in the Gulf of Naples and Salerno, for their failure to respect commitments agreed on in a previous investigation.

With two judgements of 13 June 2013 and 11 July 2013, the Rotterdam District Court annulled the decisions of the Dutch competition authority in a constructions cartel and a ship waste cartel.

In a judgement of 23 April 2013, published on 13 June 2013, the Court of Appeal of The Hague held that Difotrust, an IT firm specialised in digital forensic research, should reveal information relating to possible cartel infringers.

In June 2013, the District Court annulled two decisions of the DCA regarding, respectively, a cartel in the construction business and a cartel in the ship waste sector.

In a press release of 21 November 2013, the Dutch Competition Authority (ACM) announced that it would terminate its investigation into a possible price-fixing cartel on the market of mobile telecommunications and accept binding commitments from the three major mobile providers in the Netherlands, T-Mobile, KPN and Vodafone.

The District Court of Rotterdam annulled the Dutch Competition Authority's fines for alleged participation in a cartel in the double-glazing market.

On 5 February 2015, the Spanish Supreme Court issued a ruling which put an end to the controversy surrounding the interpretation of Article 63.1 of the Spanish Competition Act ("SCA")...

Spain's Supreme Court has voided a contract including an exclusive-supply clause in favour of Repsol, following a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union ....

On 16 April 2019, the UK Court of Appeal ruled that the Competition Appeal Tribunal ("CAT") had incorrectly refused to certify a major collective action brought against Mastercard.

On 4 April 2012, the English High Court issued an order in a pending private damages claim arising out of the gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) cartel case, further to which it has granted the claimants access to a limited set of materials produced by the defendants in leniency applications made before the European Commission.

On 26 January 2015, the English High Court issued a judgment dismissing lawsuits brought by a tobacco manufacturer.

On 19 April 2012, the UK’s Office of Fair Trading (OFT) announced its decision to fine British Airways (BA) £ 58.5 million (around € 71 million) for anti-competitive practices.