Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTAB Sees Problems With Applicant's Specimen, Affirms Refusal To Register "20/20 IN 2020" For Optometry Advertising Services

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark 20/20 IN 2020 for "advertising, marketing and promotion services" in the fields of opthalmology and optometry
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Sustains Opposition To MEZQUILA For Alcoholic Beverage, Finding No Bona Fide Intent

    The Board sustained this opposition to registration of the mark MEZQUILA for "alcoholic beverages except beer,"
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Are Collectible Toy Figures Related To Plush Toys For Purposes Of Section 2(d)?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark PINT SIZE HEROES in standard character and Stylized form for "Collectable toy figures," finding confusion likely with the registered mark PINT SIZE PRODUCTIONS & Design ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Is CRAWLER Merely Descriptive Of SUV Suspension Parts?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark CRAWLER under Section 2(e)(1), finding it merely descriptive of "light truck and sport utility vehicle aftermarket suspension parts, namely, link arms and coil springs."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Is GAVIOTA For Faucets Confusable With SEAGULL For Water Purification Units?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark GAVIOTA, in standard character form, for "Luxury bathroom faucets; Water control valves for bathroom faucets; Plumbing fittings, namely, spouts for bathroom fixtures; Tub Spouts; Shower Heads; Handles for shower faucets; Plumbing fittings, namely, [and] shower control valves," on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark SEAGULL for "water purification units and parts thereof."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Is "TAMAL TAMAYO" For Tamales Confusable With "TAMAYO" For Restaurant Services?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark TAMAL TAMAYO in the design form shown below, for "tamales," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Are These Two Four-Legged Animal Design Marks Confusable For Clothing?

    Another test for you. Abercrombie & Fitch opposed an application to register the mark RED DEAR & Design, shown below left, for various clothing items
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Are These Two "IMMORTAL" Marks For Wine Confusable?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark IMMORTAL & Design, shown below, finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark THE IMMORTAL ZIN [ZIN disclaimed], both for wine.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "ARTIZEN" Merely Descriptive Of Essential Oils?

    The USPTO issued a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the mark ARTIZEN, in standard character and stylized form, finding it to be merely descriptive of essential oils and related products.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is BARSKI Primarily Merely A Surname For Glassware And Related Goods?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark BARSKI for beverage glassware, pitchers, ice buckets, and various other items in Class 21, concluding that the mark is primarily merely a surname...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is BOOTYMAXX For Vitamins Confusable WIth BOOTYMAXTV For Non-Pornographic Videos?

    Chris Combs opposed Willie Sonley's application to register BOOTYMAXX for "vitamins," claiming a likelihood of confusion with his previously used common law mark BOOTYMAXTV
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is CHROMAFUSION For Plastic Sleeves For Trading Cards Confusable WIth CHROME For Trading Cards?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark CHROMAFUSION for plastic protective sleeves for trading cards and gaming cards, "having an opaque side and a translucent side" ... " for use in card game...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "KERRIDGE COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS" Primarily Merely A Surname?

    The USPTO refused to register the mark KERRIDGE COMMERCIAL SYSTEMS for various goods and services, all for use in the distribution...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "KEZAR" For Pharmaceutical Products Primarily Merely A Surname?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark KEZAR for pharmaceuticals and chemicals for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Video

    TTABlog Test: Is "LUCKENBACH" Primarily Merely A Surname For Whiskey?

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark LUCKENBACH for whiskey, vodka, rum, and gin, on the ground that the mark is primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is MAIN LINE REFRESH Confusable With MAIN LINE HEALTH Or MAIN LINE PLASTIC SURGERY?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark MAIN LINE REFRESH (standard characters) for "Medical consultations; Medical services; Cosmetic and plastic surgery" [MAIN LINE disclaimed], ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is PARSONS Primarily Merely A Surname For Golf Equipment?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark PARSONS for golf equipment and various ancillary goods and services, finding the mark to be primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Video

    TTABlog Test: Is "SOUND ART CREATION NASH STUDIO" Primarily Merely A Surname? (Video)

    The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark SOUND ART CREATION NASH STUDIO, in standard character form, for applicant's music production services, audio or video studio services...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is "SWISS MILITARY" Generic For Watches Of Swiss Origin?

    The USPTO refused to register the term SWISS MILITARY for "watches of Swiss origin," on the ground of genericness.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: Is This MUTILATION? USPTO Says "THE VILLE" Specimen Of Use Did Not Match The Application Drawing

    The USPTO refused to register THE VILLE (in standard character form) for educational and entertainment services provided by the University of Louisville, on the ground that the ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Showing 941–960 of 1424 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics