Search

Search

Log in or registerMenuClose

Search

Rankings
Firms & Lawyers
In-House
- In-House Content
- GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
- About us

Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV

About us

Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Trust Centre
Contact us

Deutschland DE
Paris FR

Rankings
Firms & Lawyers
In-House
- In-House Content
- GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
- About us

Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV

About us

Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Trust Centre
Contact us

Deutschland DE
Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

Legal 500 Trust Centre
Contact Us

Market Intelligence
Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics

Search for topics

Countries

Search for countries

Contributor

Search to show contributors

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Content type

Any
Article
Podcast
Video

Sort by

Article
TTABlog Test: Are Glass Ornaments Related To Dried Flower Arrangements Under Section 2(d)?
The USPTO refused registration of the proposed mark EVERLASTING ROSE for "Ornaments of glass; Ornaments of glass, namely, glass roses," finding confusion likely with the identical mark registered for "Dried flower arrangements;
United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Article
TTABlog Test: Are "PUBLIC GOODS" And "PUBLIX" Confusable For Personal Care Products?
The USPTO refused to register the mark PUBLIC GOODS for various personal products, including bar soap, toilet paper, and tooth brushes (GOODS disclaimed),
United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Are These Two "CANNONBALL" Marks Confusable For Beer?

The USPTO refused to register the mark CANNONBALL CREEK BREWING COMPANY GOLDEN, COLORADO and Design, as shown below, for "beer" [BREWING COMPANY GOLDEN,

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Does "HELP THE PERSECUTED" Fail To Function As A Mark For Charitable Fundraising Services?

The USPTO refused registration of the proposed mark HELP THE PERSECUTED (in standard character form), concluding that it fails to function as a source indicator...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

The TTAB recently decided the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. Let's see how you do with them,...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. Let's see how you do with them, keeping in mind that last year the Board affirmed...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Come Out?

A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Proceedings Come Out?

Here are three recent decisions in Section 2(d) proceedings: two oppositions and one cancellation. Can you guess how they came out based on the minimal information I have provided?...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Come Out?

A TTAB judge once told me that you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the goods/services and the marks.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?

A TTAB judge once told me that you can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the goods/services and the marks.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is "A MOTHER'S TOUCH MOVERS" Confusable With "A WOMAN'S TOUCH MOVING" For Moving Services?

The USPTO refused to register the mark A MOTHER'S TOUCH MOVERS for "transportation of household goods for others" [MOVERS disclaimed],

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is CALIHEMP Geographically Descriptive Of Skin Care Products?

The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark CALIHEMP for "skin and body topical lotions, creams, oils, balms and salves for cosmetic use, all of the foregoing containing hemp...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is KING'S RANSOM For Scotch Whiskey Sold By Invitation Confusable With The Identical Mark For Wines?

The USPTO refused to register the mark KING'S RANSOM for "spirits, namely, aged luxury Scotch whisky for private sale only by invitation," finding a likelihood of confustion...

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is "LIQUOR SLINGER DISTILLING" For Liquor Confusable With "SLINGER" For Shot Glasses?

The USPTO refused to register the mark LIQUOR SLINGER DISTILLING for "liquor" [LIQUOR and DISTILLING disclaimed], finding the mark

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is MASTER RANCHER Confusable With RANCHMASTER For Footwear?

The USPTO refused to register MASTER RANCHER, finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark RANCHMASTER, both for footwear.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is MOBILIZER Merely Descriptive Of Massage Apparatus?

The USPTO refused to register the mark MOBILIZER for "massage apparatus and instruments," deeming the mark merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1).

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is "MONFRÈRE FASHION" Confusable With "MY BROTHER" For Clothing?

The USPTO refused to register the mark MONFRÈRE FASHION for "Denim jackets; Denim jeans; Denim pants; Jeans; Men's and women's jackets, coats, trousers, vests; Pants

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is PARMA COFFEE Primarily Geographically Descriptive Of Coffee And Other Food Items?

The USPTO refused to register the proposed mark PARMA COFFEE for "chocolate; chocolate-based beverages; cocoa; cocoa-based beverages; coffee extracts; coffee and coffee substitutes

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is PRINCE KONG For Games And Toys Confusable With KING KONG & Design For Toys And KING KONG (Stylized) For Bicycles?

Examining Attorney Alison Keeley refused registration of the mark PRINCE KONG (in standard characters) for, inter alia, games, toys, and elbow pads and guards.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

TTABlog Test: Is QUERCUS COFFEE For Coffee Confusable With QUERCUS For Wine?

The USPTO refused to register the mark QUERCUS COFFEE for coffee [COFFEE disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark QUERCUS for wine.

United StatesIntellectual Property

Wolf Greenfield & Sacks

Showing 621–640 of 1424 results

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics