Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

    Last week, the TTAB ruled on the appeals from the three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals, summarized below. Let's see how you do with them. Results will be found in the first comment.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    Thus far in 2002, the Board has affirmed 77 of the first 80 Section 2(d) refusals it has considered on appeal. Here are the latest three appeals for your consideration. [Results in first comment].
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    13th DuPont Factor Saves Four "GAIA" Marks For Supplements From Section 2(d) Refusal

    "Here comes the thirteenth DuPont Factor." The Board reversed Section 2(d) refusals of the marks GAIA, GAIA KIDS, GAIA HERBS (Stylized), and GAIA HERBS (standard characters), all for supplements...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    USPTO Seeks Candidates For Administrative Trademark Judge At The TTAB

    The USPTO is seeking applications for the position of Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    USPTO Seeks Candidates For Administrative Trademark Judge At The TTAB

    The USPTO is seeking applications for the position of Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The announcement is open until
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

    A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?

    The TTAB recently ruled on the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    APPARATUS Not Generic But Merely Descriptive Of Lighting Fixtures And Related Services

    The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark APPARATUS in the stylized from shown below, finding it merely descriptive of lamps and lighting fixtures, candles, electrical repair services...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Applying Stanley Bros., TTAB Affirms Illegality Refusal Of CBD2GO For Dietary Supplements Containing CBD

    In a case "on all fours" with the Board's recent Stanley Bros. decision (TTABlogged here), the Board affirmed a refusal to register the purported mark CB2GO for...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    "BUILT BY GOD" Fails To Function As A Trademark For Clothing, Says TTAB

    We haven't had a failure-to-function case in a while. Here, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark BUILT BY GOD for various clothing items, finding that the phrase fails to function...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB's Rejection Of Website Fabric Specimen, Not A Display Associated With The Goods

    At the request of the USPTO [letter here], the CAFC has re-designated as precedential its January 14th opinion in In re Siny Corp., upholding the decision of a divided TTAB panel.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB Dismissal Of Surname Oppositions To SCHLAFLY For Beer, Finding Acquired Distinctiveness

    In this rather quixotic appeal, the CAFC upheld the TTAB's decision of August 2, 2016 [TTABlogged here], dismissing two oppositions to registration of the mark SCHLAFLY for beer.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Affirms TTAB In TAI CHI Cancellation, Giving Deference To TBMP On Evidentiary Issues

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Board's decision [here]
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Upholds TTAB Dismissal Of "Goats On A Roof" Cancellation Petition Due To Lack Of Standing

    The CAFC dismissed an appeal from a Board decision (here) that had dismissed a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CAFC Upholds TTAB: GM's "SUPER CRUISE" Driving System Not Related To "SUPERCRUISE" Computer Components For Section 2(d) Purposes

    In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC upheld the TTAB's decision (here) denying a petition for cancellation of a General Motors registration for the mark SUPER CRUISE for "computer software, cameras...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    CUBNOXIOUS Confusable with (Chicago) CUBS For Shirts, Says TTAB

    Those obnoxious Chicago Cubs are back again, this time successfully opposing an application to register the mark CUBNOXIOUS for "shirts."
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Denying Cancellation Petition, TTAB Finds That Roman Atwood's "SMILE MORE" Functions As A Mark

    The Board dismissed this petition for cancellation of Roman Atwood's registration for the mark SMILE MORE for various goods (stickers, backpacks, shirts) and for retail store service featuring clothing, denying petitioner's claim that the term fails to function as a mark.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    Despite Consent Agreement, TTAB Affirms Section 2(D) Refusal Of NORDIC (Stylized) For Live Plants

    Despite a consent agreement between Applicant and the cited Registrant, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark NORDIC in the stylized form below...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    E.D. Texas Denies Motion To Stay Infringement Action In Favor Of TTAB Proceeding

    O&M Halyard brought a civil action against Sri Trang US, Inc., claiming trademark infringement and dilution of two registered trademarks for medical gloves, one mark consisting of the color purple...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    "ENDURE" For Fire-Resistant Fabrics Confusable WIth "ENDURE By Acend" & Design For Textile Fibers, Says TTAB

    A fairly straightforward Section 2(d) case like this one usually results in an opinion of 15 or 20 pages. This one took 42 pages because it lays out each argument...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Showing 541–560 of 1424 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics