Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

1,424 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms "Unlawful Use" Refusal Of HARBOR HEMP COMPANY For Supplements "Containing Legally Produced Industrial Hemp Extract"

    Applicant Harbor Hemp applied to register the mark HARBOR HEMP COMPANY in standard character and design form (below), for non-medicated skin preparations (Class 3)
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Affirms Unlawful Use Refusal Of "PUREXXXCBD" For Plant Extracts And Supplements Containing CBD

    In a mere 5-pages, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark PUREXXXCBD for "Plant extracts for pharmaceutical purposes; vitamins; dietary supplements; all of the foregoing...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Awards Junior User USA Minus Oregon in GREENFIELD Concurrent Use Proceeding

    Applicant began use of its marks in 2002 and 2005, more than seven years before registrant filed its application to register.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Denies Cancellation Of ORGANIC ZONE: Petitioner Fails To Make Prima Facie Case Of Abandonment

    Unlike in the recent Ross Bicycles case, My Organic Zone could not prove a prima facie case of abandonment, so the Board denied the cancellation petition.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Denies Cancellation Petition Because Petitioner Failed To Prove Standing

    The Board denied this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark MORALE PATCH for "Ornamental cloth patches
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Denies Motion To Add Bogus Fraud Claim To Petition For Cancellation

    The Board denied Petitioner's motion to add a fraud claim to its petition for cancellation, finding that, as to the two grounds advanced, Petitioner's proposed pleading was legally insufficient.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Denies Petition To Cancel "ONEPACKET" Registration: Failure To Prove Nonuse

    Respondent's rope-a-dope defense proved to be successful in this cancellation proceeding aimed at a registration for the mark ONEPACKET (standard form) for computer-related services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Dismisses MANDALAEVERYWEAR Opposition; Opposer Proved Prior Advertisement But Not Prior Rendering Of Services

    Opposer James Barnard claimed prior use of the mark MANDALA for business consulting and branding services, and alleged likelihood of confusion with the Applicant's proposed mark MANDALAEVERYWEAR...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Dismisses "PAWTY PACK" Opposition Due To Failure To Establish Entitlement To A Statutory Cause Of Action (f/k/a "Standing")

    In this opposition to registration of the mark PAWTY PACK for "beverages for pets; edible pet treats," Opposer Snowcats LLC alleged and pursued a claim of mere descriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1).
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Finds "EQ LEARNING" Deceptively Misdescriptive Of Employment Counseling Services

    The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal of the proposed mark EQ LEARNING, finding it to be deceptively misdescriptive for employment counseling and related educational services.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Finds "LINGO BUS" For Language Education Communication Services Confusable With "LINGO" For Telecommunication Services

    Applicant Beijing dialed a wrong number in this appeal from the USPTO's refusal to register the mark LINGO BUS for "Providing access to databases; Providing internet chatrooms; Providing on-line forums for transmission of messages ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Finds MANHATTAN For Upholstered Furniture Confusable With MANHATTAN CABINETRY For Custom Furniture

    The TTAB affirmed this refusal to register the mark MANHATTAN for "upholstered furniture," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark MANHATTAN CABINETRY for...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Finds Photo Of Grumpy Cat Merely Descriptive Of Grumpy Cat-Related Goods And Services

    The Board affirmed two refusals to register the photograph of "Grumpy Cat" shown below, as a trademark for, inter alia, computer apps, paper goods, and stuffed toys, and as a service mark for entertainment services...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Finds WORKSUITES Merely Descriptive And Confusable With SUITEWORK For Office Space Leasing

    In a 49-page opinion, the Board sustained this opposition to registration of the mark WORKSUITES, in standard character and design form, for providing virtual office services and leasing of office space, ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Found "FOUNDRY" Deceptively Misdescriptive Of Non-Foundry Faucets

    The Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark FOUNDRY, finding it deceptively deceptively misdescriptive of "plumbing products ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Gives District Court Judgment Only Partial Res Judicata Effect, Strikes 8 Of 10 Affirmative Defenses In EASYLING Cancellation Proceeding

    Having successfully defeated an action for unfair competition brought in the Massachusetts federal court, Respondent Skawa Innovation moved for summary judgment in this cancellation proceeding...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Reverses "10HUNDRED" Specimen Refusal, Finding That Legal Services Include Providing Legal Information

    The TTAB reversed a refusal to register the mark 10HUNDRED for "legal services; legal advisory and consultancy services," overruling the Examining Attorney's rejection of applicant's specimen of use.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Reverses 2(D) Refusal Of THE AUBURN SCHOOL - Not Confusable With AUBURN UNIVERSITY

    The Board reversed Section 2(d) refusals of the mark THE AUBURN SCHOOL and the logo mark shown below, for special need educational services for children, finding the marks not confusingly similar to the registered...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Reverses Disclaimer Requirement: ANAHEIM Not Geographically Descriptive Of Clothing

    The TTAB reversed a refusal based on the USPTO's requirement, under Section 6(a), that Applicant Red Flags Fly disclaim the word ANAHEIM in its mark ANAHEIM HILLBILLIES
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Article

    TTAB Test: Are Frozen Pizza And Restaurant Services Related For Section 2(D) Purposes?

    The USPTO refused registration of the mark URBAN PIE PIZZA CO. & Design, shown below left, for "frozen pizza not sold or distributed through restaurants" ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
    Wolf Greenfield & Sacks
  • Showing 441–460 of 1424 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics