1,424 results found

The Board granted in part this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark POLO GIRLS for "Organizing and conducting...

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled two (2) oral hearings for the month of December 2020. Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.

The Board affirmed a refusal to register, on the Supplemental Register, the product configuration mark shown below, for "printed paper labels; paper identification tags; printed paper labels; adhesive labels"...

The Board reveresd a refusal to register the mark CAPSIMOPS for "Downloadable computer software for application and database integration in the educational field,"...

The Board reversed a Section 2(e)(4) refusal to register the mark PETROSSIAN in stylized form, for "Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics; All of the foresaid good being sold in delicatessen shops."

The Board reversed a refusal to register the mark AGE IQ for various medicated skin care products, finding Applicant's specimens of use to be acceptable.

The parties' goods are both relatively inexpensive products that may be purchased on impulse rather than selected with careful consideration.

In this Section 2(e)(1) opposition, the Board agreed with Opposer Christie Brinkley Skincare that Applicant Alumier's alleged mark IR DEFENSE is merely descriptive

The USPTO refused to register the mark LOVE AT FIRST SIP, in standard character form, for "mineral and aerated waters; none of the foregoing flavored with juices," ...

The USPTO refused registration of the mark shown below left, for "T-shirts," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the mark shown below right, for "clothing, namely hats and shirts."

The USPTO refused to register the mark FIT IN YOUR GENES, finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FITGENES & Design, shown below, both for weight loss programs.

Here are three Section 2(d) appeals decided two days ago. Third-party use and registration evidence played a significant role in each case.

Okay, are you ready for another test? No? Too TTABad! The USPTO refused registration of the mark BIG KAHUNA DONUTS for "donuts" and "retail store services featuring donuts"...

The USPTO refused to register the mark BRASSERIE KUNZ for "restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises"...

The USPTO refused registration of the mark LAVA GEAR for "outdoor survival wear, namely, jackets and pants for extended periods of use outdoors in extreme cold weather" [GEAR disclaimed]...

Here we go again! I hear the trumpets blow again! Oh, nevermind. You may recall that a TTAB judge once remarked that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time...

A TTAB judge once remarked that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods or services.