Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

4,415 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

1 filter applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor
Content type
Show options
  • Article

    Genus Claiming (Including Means Plus Function “MPF” Claiming) In Biotech And Pharma: Doctrinal Trajectory And Drafting Strategies

    Finnegan attorney Chiaki Kobayashi explores the complex landscape of genus claiming in biotechnology and pharmaceutical patents, examining doctrinal developments and practical drafting approaches. The article, edited by partner John D. Livingstone, provides strategic guidance for navigating means-plus-function claiming methodologies in life sciences intellectual property.
    JapanIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Draft Guidance On Efficacy And Risk Information In Direct-To-Consumer Promotional Labeling And Advertisements

    On October 17, 2018, FDA issued draft guidance on Presenting Quantitative Efficacy and Risk Information in Direct-to-Consumer Promotional Labeling and Advertisements.
United States
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Draft Guidance On Pediatric HIV Infection: Drug Development For Treatment

    On March 14, 2018, FDA issued draft guidance on Pediatric HIV Infection: Drug Development for Treatment. The draft guidance provides general guidance on the development of drug products ...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Draft Guidance On Postapproval Changes To Drug Substances

    On September 10, 2018, the FDA issued draft guidance on Postapproval Changes to Drug Substances, with recommendations regarding changes to drug substance ...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Final Guidance On Content And Format Of ANDA Applications

    On September 24, 2018, FDA issued final guidance on ANDA Submissions – Content and Format. The guidance outlines recommendations for the information that should be provided in each section...
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    FDA Issues A 2019 Test Plan For Software Precertification

    In January 2019, in conjunction with Version 1.0 of its Working Model for the Software Precertification Program,
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    First Revision To Questions And Answers On Biosimilar Development

    On December 11, 2018, FDA issued its fifth final guidance document related to the development of biosimilars and interchangeability products entitled Questions and Answers on Biosimilar
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Life Sciences Podcast Series - Inherency And Obviousness

    The Life Sciences industry can be particularly challenging for companies to navigate, often requiring careful navigation through rigorous testing and regulatory compliance.
    United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    2020 Comparative Legal Guide: United States - Patent Litigation (2020)

    Finnegan attorneys Greg Gramenopoulos, Elliot Cook, and Forrest Jones authored the Patent Litigation - United States chapter of The Legal 500's 2020 Comparative Legal Guide.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    AI Training, Data, And Governance: Copyright Battles And Legal Requirements (Podcast)

    AI is reshaping legal practice through copyright disputes over training data and emerging regulations governing data use and model deployment. Two Finnegan attorneys explore the evolving legal framework surrounding AI training data, examining critical questions about fair use, authorship, consent, and accountability that law students and practitioners must navigate.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Bitcoin Mining Patent Retains Original Inventorship

    In Bearbox LLC v. Lancium LLC, No. 2023-1922 (Fed. Cir. January 13, 2025), the Federal Circuit affirmed, among other things, the district court's determination that BearBox had not met its burden to establish.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Blocking The Road: Antibodies And Epitope Claims

    Antibodies are proteins produced in nature by the immune system and used frequently in biologic therapies for their ability to bind and alter signaling pathways involved in various diseases such as cancer, infection, and inflammation.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Collateral Estoppel May Apply If Claims In A Different, But Related Patent, Have Been Litigated Before

    In In re Arunachalam, No. 2016-1607, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB decision holding that Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam is collaterally estopped from asserting claims in U.S. Patent No. 6,212,556 ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Determining The "Article Of Manufacture" Under 35 U.S.C. 289

    The Supreme Court handed down its decision in the design patent case of Samsung v. Apple in December, 2016.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Diligence Required For Antedating Prior Art Is Reasonably Continuous Diligence—Not Continuous Exercise Of Reasonable Diligence

    In Perfect Surgical Techniques, Inc. v. Olympus America, Inc., No. 15-2043 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2016), the Federal Circuit found the diligence standard the PTAB applied in an IPR "too exacting" . . .
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    District Court Addresses Whether Patent Prosecution Bar Extends To IPR Proceedings

    In a recent case, the Board denied ScentAir's request to file a motion to disqualify Prolitec's lead counsel from representing Prolitec in an inter partes review because they were subject to a protective order in a related district court case.
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Confirms M.Z. Berger Out Of Time To Prove Intent To Use iWATCH Mark

    Swiss watchmaker giant Swatch Group Ltd. filed an opposition against an application to register the mark iWATCH in 2008, alleging that the applicant, M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc., did not have an intent to use the mark...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Denies Mandamus Petition, Confirming Non-Appealability Of Institution Decisions Despite Parties' Agreement To First Arbitrate Patent Validity

    In In re: MaxPower Semiconductor, Inc., No. 2021-146 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2021), the Federal Circuit denied MaxPower's petition for mandamus seeking review of four PTAB decisions to institute...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Distinguishes Patent Eligibility Among Different Communications Systems Claims

    The Federal Circuit recently reviewed a patent infringement case involving communication systems that use non-uniform satellite constellations to transmit digital information. While the lower court had granted summary judgment on patent eligibility and found infringement, the appellate court reached a split decision on the validity of the patents. The case highlights the ongoing challenges in determining patent eligibility under the Alice framework, particularly for claims involving mathematical concepts ve
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Article

    Federal Circuit Holds A Sublicense Does Not Automatically Survive The Termination Of A Master License

    The Federal Circuit considered choice-of-law, bankruptcy, and contract law in vacating the district court's grant of a motion to dismiss in Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Angewandten ...
    United StatesIntellectual Property
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • Showing 981–1000 of 4415 results

    Previous
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics